Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37349483›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2023

An automatic and personalized recommendation modelling in activity eCoaching with deep learning and ontology.

Ayan Chatterjee, Andreas Prinz, Michael Alexander Riegler, Yogesh Kumar Meena

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ayan ChatterjeeDepartment of Information and Communication Technology, University of Agder, 4879, Grimstad, Norway. ayan.chatterjee@uia.no.
Andreas PrinzDepartment of Information and Communication Technology, University of Agder, 4879, Grimstad, Norway.
Michael Alexander RieglerDepartment of Holistic Systems, Simula Metropolitan Center for Digital Engineering, Pilestredet 52, 0167, Oslo, Norway.
Yogesh Kumar MeenaDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering & Centre for Cognitive and Brain Science, IIT Gandhinagar, Gandhinagar, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Electronic coaching (eCoach) facilitates goal-focused development for individuals to optimize certain human behavior. However, the automatic generation of personalized recommendations in eCoaching remains a challenging task. This research paper introduces a novel approach that combines deep learning and semantic ontologies to generate hybrid and personalized recommendations by considering "Physical Activity" as a case study. To achieve this, we employ three methods: time-series forecasting, time-series physical activity level classification, and statistical metrics for data processing. Additionally, we utilize a naïve-based probabilistic interval prediction technique with the residual standard deviation used to make point predictions meaningful in the recommendation presentation. The processed results are integrated into activity datasets using an ontology called OntoeCoach, which facilitates semantic representation and reasoning. To generate personalized recommendations in an understandable format, we implement the SPARQL Protocol and RDF Query Language (SPARQL). We evaluate the performance of standard time-series forecasting algorithms [such as 1D Convolutional Neural Network Model (CNN1D), autoregression, Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM), and Gated Recurrent Units (GRU)] and classifiers [including Multilayer Perceptron (MLP), Rocket, MiniRocket, and MiniRocketVoting] using state-of-the-art metrics. We conduct evaluations on both public datasets (e.g., PMData) and private datasets (e.g., MOX2-5 activity). Our CNN1D model achieves the highest prediction accuracy of 97[Formula: see text], while the MLP model outperforms other classifiers with an accuracy of 74[Formula: see text]. Furthermore, we evaluate the performance of our proposed OntoeCoach ontology model by assessing reasoning and query execution time metrics. The results demonstrate that our approach effectively plans and generates recommendations on both datasets. The rule set of OntoeCoach can also be generalized to enhance interpretability.

Indexed as

Deep LearningAlgorithmsForecastingHumansNeural Networks, Computer

Identifiers

PMID37349483
PMCPMC10287703

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.