ArticleScientific reports2023
A convolutional recurrent neural network with attention for response prediction to repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in major depressive disorder.
Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 28 citations in OpenAlex.
- Machine learning in the prediction of treatment response for emotional disorders: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Clinical psychology review · 2025Pooled it
- Validation-Aware Retrospective EEG Treatment-Response Modelling Using Chaotic Pattern of Prime Numbers Features: Segment-Level Separability and Subject-Wise Generalisation.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Predicting depressive symptoms among Chinese college students using recurrent neural networks with longitudinal data.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Towards the Development of a Deep Learning Framework Using Adaptive and Non-Adaptive Time-Frequency Features for EEG-Based Depression Therapy Prediction.Brain sciences · 2026Article
- Multiband EEG signatures decoded using machine learning for predicting rTMS treatment response in MDD.Journal of affective disorders · 2025Article
- Predicting Depression Therapy Outcomes Using EEG-Derived Amplitude Polar Maps.Brain sciences · 2025Article
- Automated depression detection via cloud based EEG analysis with transfer learning and synchrosqueezed wavelet transform.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Prediction of response to Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS) can build a very effective treatment platform that helps Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) patients to receive timely treatment. We proposed a deep learning model powered up by state-of-the-art methods to classify responders (R) and non-responders (NR) to rTMS treatment. Pre-treatment Electro-Encephalogram (EEG) signal of public TDBRAIN dataset and 46 proprietary MDD subjects were utilized to create time-frequency representations using Continuous Wavelet Transform (CWT) to be fed into the two powerful pre-trained Convolutional Neural Networks (CNN) named VGG16 and EfficientNetB0. Equipping these Transfer Learning (TL) models with Bidirectional Long Short-Term Memory (BLSTM) and attention mechanism for the extraction of most discriminative spatiotemporal features from input images, can lead to superior performance in the prediction of rTMS treatment outcome. Five brain regions named Frontal, Central, Parietal, Temporal, and occipital were assessed and the highest evaluated performance in 46 proprietary MDD subjects was acquired for the Frontal region using the TL-LSTM-Attention model based on EfficientNetB0 with accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and Area Under the Curve (AUC) of 97.1%, 97.3%, 97.0%, and 0.96 respectively. Additionally, to test the generalizability of the proposed models, these TL-BLSTM-Attention models were evaluated on a public dataset called TDBRAIN and the highest accuracy of 82.3%, the sensitivity of 80.2%, the specificity of 81.9% and the AUC of 0.83 were obtained. Therefore, advanced deep learning methods using a time-frequency representation of EEG signals from the frontal brain region and the convolutional recurrent neural networks equipped with the attention mechanism can construct an accurate platform for the prediction of response to the rTMS treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.