Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37349325›Full record

ArticleNature communications2023

Oncogenic structural aberration landscape in gastric cancer genomes.

Mihoko Saito-Adachi, Natsuko Hama, Yasushi Totoki, Hiromi Nakamura, Yasuhito Arai, Fumie Hosoda, Hirofumi Rokutan, Shinichi Yachida, Mamoru Kato, Akihiko Fukagawa and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Clinicopathological and genomic features of extrachromosomal DNA in gastric cancer.Gastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. PNAS nexus · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. A review on trends in development and translation of omics signatures in cancer.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2024
    Review
  12. Extrachromosomal DNA in cancer.Nature reviews. Cancer · 2024
    Review
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Mihoko Saito-AdachiDivision of Cancer Genomics, National Cancer Center Research Institute, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID 0000-0001-9213-0184
Natsuko HamaDivision of Cancer Genomics, National Cancer Center Research Institute, Tokyo, Japan.
Yasushi TotokiDivision of Cancer Genomics, National Cancer Center Research Institute, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-1876-6859
Hiromi NakamuraDivision of Cancer Genomics, National Cancer Center Research Institute, Tokyo, Japan.
Yasuhito AraiDivision of Cancer Genomics, National Cancer Center Research Institute, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID 0000-0001-6306-9409
Fumie HosodaDivision of Cancer Genomics, National Cancer Center Research Institute, Tokyo, Japan.
Hirofumi RokutanDivision of Cancer Genomics, National Cancer Center Research Institute, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-4172-4892
Shinichi YachidaDivision of Cancer Genomics, National Cancer Center Research Institute, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID 0000-0001-5507-4566
Mamoru KatoDivision of Bioinformatics, National Cancer Center Research Institute, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-8485-8316
Akihiko FukagawaDivision of Cancer Genomics, National Cancer Center Research Institute, Tokyo, Japan.
Tatsuhiro ShibataDivision of Cancer Genomics, National Cancer Center Research Institute, Tokyo, Japan. tashibat@ncc.go.jp.ORCID 0000-0002-0477-210X
The University of Osaka · JPNational Cancer Center · USThe University of Tokyo · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Structural variants (SVs) are responsible for driver events in gastric cancer (GC); however, their patterns and processes remain poorly understood. Here, we examine 170 GC whole genomes to unravel the oncogenic structural aberration landscape in GC genomes and identify six rearrangement signatures (RSs). Non-random combinations of RSs elucidate distinctive GC subtypes comprising one or a few dominant RS that are associated with specific driver events (BRCA1/2 defects, mismatch repair deficiency, and TP53 mutation) and epidemiological backgrounds. Twenty-seven SV hotspots are identified as GC driver candidates. SV hotspots frequently constitute complexly clustered SVs involved in driver gene amplification, such as ERBB2, CCNE1, and FGFR2. Further deconstruction of the locally clustered SVs uncovers amplicon-generating profiles characterized by super-large SVs and intensive segmental amplifications, contributing to the extensive amplification of GC oncogenes. Comprehensive analyses using adjusted SV allele frequencies indicate the significant involvement of extra-chromosomal DNA in processes linked to specific RSs.

Indexed as

Stomach NeoplasmsBRCA1 ProteinBRCA2 ProteinHumansBRCA1 ProteinBRCA1 protein, humanBRCA2 ProteinBRCA2 protein, human

Identifiers

PMID37349325
PMCPMC10287692
OpenAlexW4381614945

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.