ArticlePhysiological reports2023
Evaluation of blood pressure response during dobutamine stress echocardiography in patients without cardiovascular diseases.
Article in Physiological reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Evaluation of blood pressure response during dobutamine stress echocardiography in patients without cardiovascular diseases.Physiological reports · 2023Article
- Hypertensive Response During Dobutamine Stress Echocardiography: Does it Indicate a Higher Risk of Developing Hypertension?Journal of cardiovascular echographyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Dobutamine stress echocardiography (DSE) is a diagnostic tool for determining coronary artery disease. Considering hypotension and hypertension as important complications of DSE, we aimed to evaluate the blood pressure (BP) responses during DSE. Patients without known cardiovascular diseases who underwent DSE were included. We excluded patients who had hypertension, diabetes mellitus, a known history of cardiovascular diseases, and those taking vasoactive medications. Systolic (SBP) and diastolic (DBP) blood pressure were recorded at baseline and peak stress. We included 688 patients with an age of 57.9 ± 12.01 years. During DSE, SBP (+19.72 ± 26.51 mm Hg, p < 0.001), DBP (+5.52 ± 17.35 mm Hg, p < 0.001), and HR (+54.05 ± 22.45 bpm, p < 0.001) significantly increased from baseline to peak stress. The normal cut-off value was measured between 101-210 mm Hg for SBP and 50-121 mm Hg for DBP. According to this normal cutoff, 11 (1.3%) and 30 (4.4%) patients had hypotensive and hypertensive SBP and 15 (2.2%) and 21 (3.1%) patients had hypotensive and hypertensive DBP, respectively. The hypotensive response was correlated with baseline SBP (r = 0.6, p = 0.001) and atropine (r = -2.18, p = 0.043), and the hypertensive response was correlated with baseline SBP (r = 0.048, p < 0.001). Baseline BP and atropine consumption were the independent variables associated with the outside-the-normal range of blood pressure responses.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.