Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37348925›Full record

ArticleBMJ case reports2023

Metastatic breast cancer and monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance resembling multiple myeloma.

Paula Muehlschlegel, Roopinder Gillmore, Sabine Pomplun

Open access · greenAbstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ case reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 75% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Paula MuehlschlegelOncology, University College London Hospital, London, UK paula.muehlschlegel@nhs.net.
Roopinder GillmoreOncology, Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Sabine PomplunHistopathology, cytopathology, University College London Hospital, London, UK.
Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust · GBUniversity College Hospital · GBUniversity College London · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Radiological evidence of lytic bone lesions has a wide differential diagnosis including metastatic bone disease, multiple myeloma, primary bone cancers and infection. Here, we present the case of a woman in her 80s found to have lytic bone lesions associated with an IgA paraproteinaemia who was thus presumed to have a diagnosis of multiple myeloma. However, bone marrow biopsy results were indicative of monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance. She was subsequently referred to the 'carcinoma of unknown primary (CUP) team', and ultimately diagnosed with metastatic breast cancer following a repeat trephine biopsy. A range of conditions may present with lytic bone lesions and these differentials must be suitably investigated even in the presence of paraproteinaemia. Early CUP team involvement is pivotal to ensure appropriate clinical management and patient support.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsMonoclonal Gammopathy of Undetermined SignificanceMultiple MyelomaParaproteinemiasFemaleHumansRadiographyBreast cancerMalignant and Benign haematologyOncology

Identifiers

PMID37348925
PMCPMC10314513
OpenAlexW4381621080

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.