ArticleCancer reports (Hoboken, N.J.)2023
Sex-specific differences in colorectal cancer: A multicenter retrospective cohort study.
Article in Cancer reports (Hoboken, N.J.), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- A Randomized Trial of Encorafenib and Cetuximab Versus Irinotecan/Cetuximab or FOLFIRI/Cetuximab in Chinese Patients With BRAFCancer medicine · 2026Trial
- Sex differences in the risk profiles for anastomotic leakage following surgery for rectal cancer.Surgery today · 2026Article
- Sex Differences in Colorectal Tumor-Associated T-cell Responses.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2026Article
- Review
- Sex and gender-oriented colorectal cancer screening: a consensus study from the AIOM- GISEG working group.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- Advances in Colorectal Cancer: Epidemiology, Gender and Sex Differences in Biomarkers and Their Perspectives for Novel Biosensing Detection Methods.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- CK2α Overexpression in Colorectal Cancer: Evidence for Sex- and Age-Linked Differences.Cancers · 2025Article
- Burden of colorectal cancer attributable to diet low in milk among middle-aged and elderly population from 1990 to 2021: a population-based study.Aging clinical and experimental research · 2025Article
- Colorectal Cancer: A Brief and Simplified Analysis of a Complex Disease.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2024Article
- Integrated molecular profiling ofJournal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2024Article
- Sex-specific differences in colorectal cancer: A multicenter retrospective cohort study.Cancer reports (Hoboken, N.J.) · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 10 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDue to sex-specific differences in the incidence and clinical and histopathological characteristics of colorectal cancer (CRC), understanding the impact of sex on CRC may suggest sex-targeted strategies for screening, treatment, and prevention, leading to improved prognosis of CRC. However, there have been few studies investigating the sex-specific differences in CRC in the Republic of Korea. We aimed to assess sex differences in CRC in the Republic of Korea.
methodsThis was a retrospective, multicenter, cohort study of patients diagnosed with CRC between January 2012 and December 2013 at nine hospitals. Patients who had an uncertain CRC stage, were diagnosed with other cancers within 5 years, had carcinoma in situ, non-epithelial cancer, or primary cancer other than CRC, were excluded. Factors associated with overall survival or progression-free survival were investigated using Cox regression analysis. Cumulative probability of metachronous lesions was compared using the Kaplan-Meier estimator survival analysis and we compared the survival curves of each group using a log-rank test. Outcomes were compared using the chi-square, Fisher's exact, or Student's t-test, as appropriate.
resultsThree thousand one hundred and forteen patients (1999 men, 1315 women) were included. There was no significant difference in the age at onset between men and women. The proportion of patients diagnosed through regular health check-ups, and asymptomatic at time of diagnosis, was higher in men (48.9% men vs. 42.0% women, p < .001). Rectal cancers were more common in men (38.8% men vs. 31.8% women, p < .001). Right colon cancers were more common in women (31.4% women vs. 22.7% men, p < .001). KRAS mutations were found in 109/317 (34.4%) women and 112/480 (23.3%) men. Overall CRC survival and progression-free survival were similar in both sexes.
conclusionSex differences in CRC may be due to the biological and social-behavioral differences between the sexes. They should be considered during screening, diagnosis, and treatment of CRC for better outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.