Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37348815›Full record

ArticleOphthalmology. Glaucoma

Greater Outflow Facility Increase After Targeted Trabecular Bypass in Angiographically Determined Low-low Regions.

Clemens A Strohmaier, Daniel Wanderer, Xiaowei Zhang, Devansh Agarwal, Christopher B Toomey, Karl Wahlin, Hao F Zhang, W Daniel Stamer, Robert N Weinreb, Fiona S McDonnell and 1 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ophthalmology. Glaucoma. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.1field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Segmental Unconventional Outflow in Mouse Eyes.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2023
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Clemens A StrohmaierDepartment of Ophthalmology and Optometry, Kepler University Hospital, Johannes Kepler University, Linz, Austria; The Viterbi Family Department of Ophthalmology, Hamilton Glaucoma Center, Shiley Eye Institute, University of California, San Diego, California. Electronic address: Clemens.strohmaier@gmail.com.
Daniel WandererThe Viterbi Family Department of Ophthalmology, Hamilton Glaucoma Center, Shiley Eye Institute, University of California, San Diego, California.
Xiaowei ZhangThe Viterbi Family Department of Ophthalmology, Hamilton Glaucoma Center, Shiley Eye Institute, University of California, San Diego, California.
Devansh AgarwalThe Viterbi Family Department of Ophthalmology, Hamilton Glaucoma Center, Shiley Eye Institute, University of California, San Diego, California.
Christopher B ToomeyThe Viterbi Family Department of Ophthalmology, Hamilton Glaucoma Center, Shiley Eye Institute, University of California, San Diego, California.
Karl WahlinThe Viterbi Family Department of Ophthalmology, Hamilton Glaucoma Center, Shiley Eye Institute, University of California, San Diego, California.
Hao F ZhangDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois.
W Daniel StamerDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina.
Robert N WeinrebThe Viterbi Family Department of Ophthalmology, Hamilton Glaucoma Center, Shiley Eye Institute, University of California, San Diego, California.
Fiona S McDonnellMoran Eye Center, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah.
Alex S HuangThe Viterbi Family Department of Ophthalmology, Hamilton Glaucoma Center, Shiley Eye Institute, University of California, San Diego, California.
University of California San Diego · USDuke University · USJohannes Kepler University of Linz · ATNorthwestern University · USUniversity of Utah · US

Funding

Vision BiostatisticsP30EY022589 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI Derek Stuart Welsbie · 2012 to 2026
$10.3M
Medical Scientist Training Program Training GrantT32GM145449 · NIGMS · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI Christopher D Kontos · 2022 to 2026
$6.6M
Diagnosis and Monitoring of Glaucoma with Optical Coherence Tomography AngiographyR01EY029058 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI WEINREB, ROBERT N · 2018 to 2024
$4.2M
Dynamic Variable Aqueous Humor Outflow and Glaucoma Therapies in the Human EyeR01EY030501 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI Alex Huang, Hao F Zhang · 2020 to 2026
$3.5M
Translational Vision Research Training at UCSDT32EY026590 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI ZANGWILL, LINDA M · 2016 to 2025
$854k
Exosomes and Conventional Outflow HomeostasisR00EY031737 · NEI · UTAH STATE HIGHER EDUCATION SYSTEM--UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI MCDONNELL, FIONA · 2023 to 2025
$747k
NEI NIH HHS P30 EY022589NEI NIH HHS R01 EY029058NEI NIH HHS R01 EY030501NEI NIH HHS T32 EY026590NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM145449
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo investigate the impact of trabecular bypass surgery targeted to angiographically determined high- vs. low-aqueous humor outflow areas on outflow facility (C) and intraocular pressure (IOP).

designEx vivo comparative study. SUBJECTS: Postmortem ex vivo porcine and human eyes.

methodsPorcine (n = 14) and human (n = 13) whole globes were acquired. In both species, anterior segments were dissected, mounted onto a perfusion chamber, and perfused using Dulbecco's phosphate buffered solution containing glucose in a constant flow paradigm to achieve a stable baseline. Fluorescein was perfused into the anterior chamber and used to identify baseline segmental high- and low-flow regions of the conventional outflow pathways. The anterior segments were divided into 2 groups, and a 5 mm needle goniotomy was performed in either a high- or low-flow area. Subsequently, C and IOP were quantitatively reassessed and compared between surgery in baseline "high-flow" and "low-flow" region eyes followed by indocyanine green angiography.

main outcome measuresOutflow facility.

resultsIn all eyes, high- and low-flow segments could be identified. Performing a 5-mm goniotomy increased outflow facility to a variable extent depending on baseline flow status. In the porcine high-flow group, C increased from 0.31 ± 0.09 to 0.39 ± 0.09 μL/mmHg/min (P = 0.12). In the porcine low-flow group, C increased from 0.29 ± 0.03 to 0.56 ± 0.10 μL/mmHg/min (P < 0.001). In the human high-flow group, C increased from 0.38 ± 0.20 to 0.41 ± 0.20 μL/mmHg/min (P = 0.02). In the human low-flow group, C increased from 0.25 ± 0.11 to 0.32 ± 0.11 μL/mmHg/min (<0.001). There was statistically significant greater increase in C for eyes where surgery was targeted to baseline low-flow regions in both porcine (0.07 ± 0.09 vs. 0.27 ± 0.13, P = 0.007 μL/mmHg/min, high vs low flow) and human eyes (0.03 ± 0.03 vs. 0.07 ± 0.02, P = 0.03 μL/mmHg/min, high vs. low flow).

conclusionsTargeting surgery to low-flow areas of the trabecular meshwork yields higher overall facility increase and IOP reduction compared to surgery in high-flow areas. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S): Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.

Indexed as

Aqueous HumorTrabeculectomyAnimalsAnterior ChamberHumansIntraocular PressureSwineTrabecular MeshworkAqueous humor angiographyConventional outflowMinimally invasive glaucoma surgeryOutflow facilitySegmental outflow

Identifiers

PMID37348815
PMCPMC10917462
OpenAlexW4381434458

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.