Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37348506›Full record

ArticleNeuron2023

Direct and indirect neurogenesis generate a mosaic of distinct glutamatergic projection neuron types in cerebral cortex.

Dhananjay Huilgol, Jesse M Levine, William Galbavy, Bor-Shuen Wang, Miao He, Shreyas M Suryanarayana, Z Josh Huang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neuron, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Impact of Prenatal Alcohol Exposure on Cerebral Cortex Development.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2026
    Review
  9. Temporal Transcriptional Regulation of Human Neuronal Differentiation via Forward Programming.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Dhananjay HuilgolDepartment of Neurobiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710, USA; Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, NY 11724, USA.
Jesse M LevineCold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, NY 11724, USA; Program in Neuroscience and Medical Scientist Training Program, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY 11794, USA.
William GalbavyCold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, NY 11724, USA; Program in Neuroscience, Department of Neurobiology and Behavior, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY 11794, USA.
Bor-Shuen WangCold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, NY 11724, USA.
Miao HeCold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, NY 11724, USA; Institutes of Brain Science, State Key Laboratory of Medical Neurobiology and MOE Frontiers Center for Brain Science, Department of Neurobiology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China.
Shreyas M SuryanarayanaDepartment of Neurobiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710, USA.
Z Josh HuangDepartment of Neurobiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710, USA; Department of Biomedical Engineering, Duke University, Durham, NC 27708, USA; Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, NY 11724, USA. Electronic address: josh.huang@duke.edu.

Funding

Tool and Technology Development CoreU19MH114821 · NIMH · COLD SPRING HARBOR LABORATORY · PI MITRA, PARTHA PRATIM · 2017 to 2021
$64.5M
RNA-programmable cell-type targeting, editing, and therapyDP1MH129954 · NIMH · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI HUANG, Z JOSH · 2021 to 2025
$5.6M
Activity-dependent development of chandelier cell cortical integration and connectivityF32NS096877 · NINDS · COLD SPRING HARBOR LABORATORY · PI WANG, BOR-SHUEN · 2016 to 2018
$184k
Role of Tbr2+ intermediate progenitors in the specification of cortical pyramidal neuron subtypesF30MH108333 · NIMH · STATE UNIVERSITY NEW YORK STONY BROOK · PI LEVINE, JESSE M · 2015 to 2018
$164k
NIMH NIH HHS DP1 MH129954NIMH NIH HHS F30 MH108333NIMH NIH HHS U19 MH114821NINDS NIH HHS F32 NS096877
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Variations in size and complexity of the cerebral cortex result from differences in neuron number and composition, rooted in evolutionary changes in direct and indirect neurogenesis (dNG and iNG) that are mediated by radial glia and intermediate progenitors (IPs), respectively. How dNG and iNG differentially contribute to neuronal number, diversity, and connectivity are unknown. Establishing a genetic fate-mapping method to differentially visualize dNG and iNG in mice, we found that while both dNG and iNG contribute to all cortical structures, iNG contributes the largest relative proportions to the hippocampus and neocortex. Within the neocortex, whereas dNG generates all major glutamatergic projection neuron (PN) classes, iNG differentially amplifies and diversifies PNs within each class; the two pathways generate distinct PN types and assemble fine mosaics of lineage-based cortical subnetworks. Our results establish a ground-level lineage framework for understanding cortical development and evolution by linking foundational progenitor types and neurogenic pathways to PN types.

Indexed as

Cerebral CortexNeocortexAnimalsHippocampusInterneuronsMiceNeurogenesisNeuronsdirect neurogenesisdNGfate mappingindirect neurogenesisiNGneocortexpalliumPyNspyramidal neurons

Identifiers

PMID37348506
PMCPMC10527425

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.