Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37348437›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of surgical research2023

Patient and Provider Perceptions About Communication After Bariatric Surgery: A Qualitative Analysis.

Chloe S Lam, Esra Alagoz, Dawda Jawara, Jacqueline A Murtha, Catherine R Breuer, Bhabna Pati, Lindsey Eierman, Dorothy Farrar-Edwards, Corrine I Voils, Luke M Funk

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of surgical research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Systematic Review of Patient Preferences and Experiences Regarding Dietetic Outpatient Care.Journal of human nutrition and dietetics : the official journal of the British Dietetic Association · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Chloe S LamDepartment of Surgery, Wisconsin Surgical Outcomes Research Program (WiSOR), University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin.
Esra AlagozDepartment of Surgery, Wisconsin Surgical Outcomes Research Program (WiSOR), University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin.
Dawda JawaraDepartment of Surgery, Wisconsin Surgical Outcomes Research Program (WiSOR), University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin.
Jacqueline A MurthaDepartment of Surgery, Wisconsin Surgical Outcomes Research Program (WiSOR), University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin.
Catherine R BreuerDepartment of Surgery, Wisconsin Surgical Outcomes Research Program (WiSOR), University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin.
Bhabna PatiDepartment of Surgery, Wisconsin Surgical Outcomes Research Program (WiSOR), University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin.
Lindsey EiermanDepartment of Surgery, Wisconsin Surgical Outcomes Research Program (WiSOR), University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin.
Dorothy Farrar-EdwardsCollaborative Center for Health Equity, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin.
Corrine I VoilsDepartment of Surgery, Wisconsin Surgical Outcomes Research Program (WiSOR), University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin; Department of Surgery, William S. Middleton Memorial Veterans Administration Hospital, Madison, Wisconsin.
Luke M FunkDepartment of Surgery, Wisconsin Surgical Outcomes Research Program (WiSOR), University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin; Department of Surgery, William S. Middleton Memorial Veterans Administration Hospital, Madison, Wisconsin. Electronic address: funk@surgery.wisc.edu.

Funding

University of Wisconsin Institute for Clinical and Translational ResearchUL1TR002373 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI ELIZABETH S BURNSIDE, Allan R. Brasier · 2017 to 2026
$75.9M
TRAINING IN NUTRITIONT32DK007665 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI GUY E GROBLEWSKI, Chi- Liang Eric Yen · 1993 to 2026
$9.2M
Impact of Financing on Outcomes of Methadone MaintenanceR01DA015060 · NIDA · RMC RESEARCH CORPORATION · PI DECK, DENNIS D · 2002 to 2004
$1.4M
Surgery Summer Research Experience for Medical StudentsT35DK062709 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI MEZRICH, JOSHUA D · 2006 to 2023
$870k
Addressing Disparities in Bariatric Surgery outcomes for Medicaid PatientsR21MD012655 · NIMHD · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI FUNK, LUKE M · 2018 to 2019
$421k
Identifying and Addressing Barriers to Bariatric Surgery within VAIK2HX002064 · VA · WM S. MIDDLETON MEMORIAL VETERANS HOSP · PI FUNK, LUKE M · 2018 to 2020
–
HSRD VA IK2 HX002064NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002373NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA015060NIDDK NIH HHS T32 DK007665NIDDK NIH HHS T35 DK062709NIMHD NIH HHS R21 MD012655
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionCommunication between patients and providers can strongly influence patient behavior after surgery. The objective of this study was to assess patient and provider perceptions of how communication affected weight-related behaviors after bariatric surgery. MATERIALS AND

methodsSemistructured interviews with bariatric surgery patients and providers were conducted from April-November 2020. Patients who had Medicaid within 3 y of surgery were defined as socioeconomically disadvantaged. Interview guides were derived from Andersen's Behavioral Model of Health Services and Torain's Framework for Surgical Disparities. Participants described postoperative experiences regarding diet, physical activity, and follow-up care. A codebook was developed deductively based on the two theories. Directed content analysis identified themes pertaining to patient-provider communication.

resultsForty-five participants were interviewed, including 24 patients (83% female; 79% White), six primary care providers, four health psychologists, five registered dietitians, and six bariatric surgeons. Four themes regarding communication emerged: (1) Patients experiencing weight regain did not want to follow-up with providers to discuss their weight; (2) Patients from socioeconomically disadvantaged backgrounds had less trust and required more rapport-building from providers to enhance trust; (3) Patients felt that providers did not get to know them personally, which was perceived as a lack of personalized communication; and (4) Providers often changed their language to be simpler, so patients could understand them.

conclusionsPatient-provider communication after bariatric surgery is essential, but perceptions about the elements of communication differ between patients and providers. Reassuring patients who have attained less weight loss than expected and establishing trust with socioeconomically vulnerable patients could strengthen care after bariatric surgery.

Indexed as

Bariatric SurgeryCommunicationFemaleHumansMaleQualitative ResearchBariatric patient experiencePatient-provider communication

Identifiers

PMID37348437
PMCPMC10524725

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.