ArticleEnvironmental science & technology2023
Explore the Dosimetric Relationship between the Intake of Chemical Contaminants and Their Occurrence in Blood and Urine.
Article in Environmental science & technology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.
- Ingestion of Surface Residues Dominates Quaternary Ammonium Compounds (QACs) Exposure in Chinese Urban Homes: Evidence from Silicone Wristband Passive Sampling and Urinary Biomonitoring.Environmental science & technology · 2026Article
- Environmental Xenobiotics and Epigenetic Modifications: Implications for Human Health and Disease.Journal of xenobiotics · 2025Review
- Biomonitoring Xenobiotics in Human Biospecimens: Challenges, Advances, and the Future of Exposome Characterization.Reviews of environmental contamination and toxicology · 2025Article
- Methodology for Biological Sample Collection, Processing, and Storage in the Newcastle 1000 Pregnancy Cohort: Protocol for a Longitudinal, Prospective Population-Based Study in Australia.JMIR research protocols · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The dosimetric relationship between the human intake dose of a chemical contaminant (an "external dose") and its concentrations in bodily fluids such as blood and urine (related to an "internal dose"), often characterized by a dose-to-concentration ratio, has critical applications in exposure science, toxicology, and risk assessment, especially in the "new approach methods" era. However, there is a lack of a mechanistic, systematic understanding of how such a dosimetric relationship depends on fundamental chemical properties, such as partition coefficients and biotransformation half-lives. Here, we investigate this issue using a well-evaluated toxicokinetic model, which links external and internal doses by quantifying the absorption and elimination of chemicals. Results are visualized in a series of chemical partitioning space plots, whereby a chemical's dose-to-concentration ratio can be approximately predicted based on its partitioning between air, water, and octanol phases. Our results indicate that when taken in equal doses, chemicals with low volatility and moderate to high hydrophobicity exhibit the highest concentrations in the blood, and chemicals undergoing significant biotransformation tend to exhibit lower concentrations in comparison to their counterparts undergoing negligible biotransformation but possessing similar partitioning properties. Chemicals with high hydrophilicity have the highest concentrations in urine. Such revealed property dependence is similar for both adults and children and for individuals with normal body weights and with obesity. Overall, insights gained from this study are important in predicting blood and urinary concentrations from exposure information and in determining the exposure rate that produces the blood or urinary concentrations observed in biomonitoring studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.