Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37347411›Full record

ReviewDrugs & aging2023

Platelet-Rich Plasma for Knee Osteoarthritis: What Does the Evidence Say?

Mario Simental-Mendía, Daniela Ortega-Mata, Carlos A Acosta-Olivo

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Drugs & aging, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.8field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Using platelet concentrates to treat maxillofacial tissue lesions.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2024
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Mario Simental-MendíaOrthopedic Trauma Service, University Hospital "Dr. José Eleuterio González", School of Medicine, Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo León, Ave. Francisco I. Madero and Ave. Dr. José Eleuterio González, 64460, Monterrey, Nuevo León, Mexico.ORCID 0000-0002-7179-494X
Daniela Ortega-MataOrthopedic Trauma Service, University Hospital "Dr. José Eleuterio González", School of Medicine, Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo León, Ave. Francisco I. Madero and Ave. Dr. José Eleuterio González, 64460, Monterrey, Nuevo León, Mexico.
Carlos A Acosta-OlivoOrthopedic Trauma Service, University Hospital "Dr. José Eleuterio González", School of Medicine, Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo León, Ave. Francisco I. Madero and Ave. Dr. José Eleuterio González, 64460, Monterrey, Nuevo León, Mexico. dr.carlosacosta@gmail.com.
Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo León · MX

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The utilization of platelet-rich-plasma as a therapeutic intervention for knee osteoarthritis has gained immense attention since 2008. The increase in the number of scientific publications dedicated to this area can be attributed to the majority of favorable results reported in clinical trials and basic science studies. However, despite the growing evidence, the use of platelet-rich plasma in clinical practice still poses controversial aspects. The potential mechanisms of action described for platelet-rich-plasma so far indicate that it could serve as a disease-modifying drug, acting to counteract important aspects of knee osteoarthritis pathophysiology (cartilage breakdown, inflammation, and bone remodeling). Nevertheless, its efficacy in slowing down the progression of knee osteoarthritis remains unproven. While inconsistencies have been noted, the majority of controlled clinical trials and meta-analyses advocate for the utilization of platelet-rich-plasma in treating knee osteoarthritis, as it has demonstrated greater efficacy than hyaluronic acid and placebo, with a follow-up of at least 1 year. Despite advancements made in certain areas, significant diversity persists regarding the formulations used, therapeutic regimen, extended follow-up periods, patient selection, and assessment of clinically relevant outcomes. Consequently, the leading clinical practice guidelines do not recommend its use. In light of the emerging evidence, this narrative review aims to provide an objective evaluation of the recent available scientific literature (last 5 years) focused on randomized clinical trials and meta-analyses to present a current overview of the topic.

Indexed as

Osteoarthritis, KneePlatelet-Rich PlasmaHumansHyaluronic AcidInflammationInjections, Intra-ArticularTreatment OutcomeHyaluronic Acid

Identifiers

PMID37347411
OpenAlexW4381597293

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.