Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37347294›Full record

Observational studyActa neurochirurgica2023

Spinal fusion for single-level SPECT/CT positive lumbar degenerative disc disease: the SPINUS I study.

Radek Kaiser, Michal Varga, Otto Lang, Petr Waldauf, Petr Vaněk, Karel Saur, Vladimír Beneš, David Netuka

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Acta neurochirurgica, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04876586 (The SPINUS I Study), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04876586 completednot on this map

The SPINUS I Study: Spinal Fusion for a Single Level SPECT/CT Positive Lumbar Degenerative Disc Disease

TypeobservationalSponsorMilitary University Hospital, PragueRan2018 to 2023Enrolled38ConditionsDegenerative Disc Disease, Back Pain, LowArmsLumbar fusion
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Radek KaiserDepartment of Neurosurgery and Neurooncology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and Military University Hospital Prague, U Vojenské Nemocnice 1200, 16902, Prague, Czech Republic. rkaiser@hotmail.cz.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5985-9595
Michal VargaDepartment of Spinal Surgery, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and University Hospital Motol, Prague, Czech Republic.
Otto LangDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Third Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and University Hospital Kralovske Vinohrady, Prague, Czech Republic.
Petr WaldaufDepartment of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine, Third Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and University Hospital Kralovske Vinohrady, Prague, Czech Republic.
Petr VaněkDepartment of Neurosurgery and Neurooncology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and Military University Hospital Prague, U Vojenské Nemocnice 1200, 16902, Prague, Czech Republic.
Karel SaurDepartment of Neurosurgery and Neurooncology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and Military University Hospital Prague, U Vojenské Nemocnice 1200, 16902, Prague, Czech Republic.
Vladimír BenešDepartment of Neurosurgery and Neurooncology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and Military University Hospital Prague, U Vojenské Nemocnice 1200, 16902, Prague, Czech Republic.
David NetukaDepartment of Neurosurgery and Neurooncology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and Military University Hospital Prague, U Vojenské Nemocnice 1200, 16902, Prague, Czech Republic.
Charles University · CZ

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introduction and purposeWith current imaging modalities and diagnostic tests, identifying pain generators in patients with non-specific chronic low back pain (CLBP) is difficult. There is growing evidence of the effectiveness of SPECT/CT examination in diagnosing the source of pain in the spine. The study aims to investigate the effect of posterior interbody fusion on a single-level SPECT/CT positive lumbar degenerative disc disease (DDD). MATERIAL AND

methodsThis is a prospective study of patients with chronic low back pain (CLBP) operated on for a single-level SPECT/CT positive DDD. Primary outcomes were changes in visual analogue scale (VAS) scores and the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI). Secondary outcomes were complications, return to work, satisfaction and willingness to re-undergo surgery.

resultsDuring a 3-year period, 38 patients underwent single-level fusion surgery. The mean preoperative VAS score of 8.4 (± 1.1) decreased to 3.2 (± 2.5, p < 0.001) and the mean preoperative ODI of 51.5 (± 7.3) improved to 20.7 (± 14.68, p < 0.001) at a 2-year follow-up. A minimum clinically important difference (30% reduction in VAS and ODI) was achieved in 84.2% of patients. Some 71% of patients were satisfied with the surgery results and 89.4% would undergo surgery again. There were four complications, and two patients underwent revision surgery. Some 82.9% of patients returned to work.

conclusionFusion for one-level SPECT/CT positive lumbar DDD resulted in substantial clinical improvement and satisfaction with surgical treatment. Therefore, SPECT/CT imaging could be useful in assessing patients with CLBP, especially those with unclear MRI findings.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04876586.

Indexed as

Intervertebral Disc DegenerationLow Back PainSpinal FusionHumansLumbar VertebraeProspective StudiesRetrospective StudiesTomography, Emission-Computed, Single-PhotonTomography, X-Ray ComputedTreatment OutcomeAxial painDegenerative disc diseaseLow back painSPECTSpinal fusion

Identifiers

PMID37347294
PMCPMC10477220
OpenAlexW4381599193

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.