Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37347180›Full record

ArticleMicrobiology spectrum2023

Evaluation of Ortho VITROS and Roche Elecsys S and NC Immunoassays for SARS-CoV-2 Serosurveillance Applications.

Hasan Sulaeman, Eduard Grebe, Honey Dave, Lily McCann, Clara Di Germanio, Aditi Sanghavi, Victoria Sclar, Daniel W Bougie, Garrick Chatelain, Brad J Biggerstaff and 5 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Microbiology spectrum, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 7 institutions in 3 countries.

Hasan Sulaeman *Vitalant Research Institute, San Francisco, California, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3061-2185
Eduard Grebe *Vitalant Research Institute, San Francisco, California, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7046-7245
Honey DaveVitalant Research Institute, San Francisco, California, USA.
Lily McCannVitalant Research Institute, San Francisco, California, USA.
Clara Di GermanioVitalant Research Institute, San Francisco, California, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6047-211X
Aditi SanghaviVitalant Research Institute, San Francisco, California, USA.
Victoria SclarVitalant Research Institute, San Francisco, California, USA.
Daniel W BougieVersiti Blood Center, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA.
Garrick ChatelainThe Blood Center, New Orleans, Louisiana, USA.
Brad J BiggerstaffCenters for Disease Control and Prevention, Fort Collins, Colorado, USA.
Jefferson M JonesCOVID-19 Response Team, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Natalie J ThornburgCOVID-19 Response Team, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Steve KleinmanUniversity of British Columbia, Victoria, British Columbia, Canada.
Mars Stone *Vitalant Research Institute, San Francisco, California, USA.
Michael P Busch *Vitalant Research Institute, San Francisco, California, USA.
Pacific Research Institute · USCenters for Disease Control and Prevention · USUniversity of California, San Francisco · USNew York Blood Center · USStellenbosch University · ZAUniversity of British Columbia · CAVersiti Blood Center of Wisconsin · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

SARS-CoV-2 seroprevalence studies are instrumental in monitoring epidemic activity and require well-characterized, high-throughput assays, and appropriate testing algorithms. The U.S. Nationwide Blood Donor Seroprevalence Study performed monthly cross-sectional serological testing from July 2020 to December 2021, implementing evolving testing algorithms in response to changes in pandemic activity. With high vaccine uptake, anti-Spike (S) reactivity rates reached >80% by May 2021, and the study pivoted from reflex Roche anti-nucleocapsid (NC) testing of Ortho S-reactive specimens to parallel Ortho S/NC testing. We evaluated the performance of the Ortho NC assay as a replacement for the Roche NC assay and compared performance of parallel S/NC testing on both platforms. Qualitative and quantitative agreement of Ortho NC with Roche NC assays was evaluated on preselected S/NC concordant and discordant specimens. All 190 Ortho S+/Roche NC+ specimens were reactive on the Ortho NC assay; 34% of 367 Ortho S+/Roche NC- specimens collected prior to vaccine availability and 43% of 37 Ortho S-/Roche NC+ specimens were reactive on the Ortho NC assay. Performance of parallel S/NC testing using Ortho and Roche platforms was evaluated on 200 specimens collected in 2019 and 3,903 study specimens collected in 2021. All 200 pre-COVID-19 specimens tested negative on the four assays. Cross-platform agreement between Roche and Ortho platforms was 96.4% (3,769/3,903); most discordant results had reactivity close to the cutoffs on the alternate assays. These findings, and higher efficiency and throughput, support the use of parallel S/NC testing on either Roche or Ortho platforms for large serosurveillance studies.

Indexed as

COVID-19SARS-CoV-2Antibodies, ViralCross-Sectional StudiesHumansImmunoassayPandemicsSeroepidemiologic StudiesAntibodies, ViralantibodiesCOVID-19SARS-CoV-2serologyserosurveillanceserosurvey

Identifiers

PMID37347180
PMCPMC10434072
OpenAlexW4381597767

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.