Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37347087›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Statistical Association2023

Matching One Sample According to Two Criteria in Observational Studies.

B Zhang, D S Small, K B Lasater, M McHugh, J H Silber, P R Rosenbaum

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Statistical Association, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Using case description information to reduce sensitivity to bias for the attributable fraction among the exposed.Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series A, (Statistics in Society) · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Testing Biased Randomization Assumptions and Quantifying Imperfect Matching and Residual Confounding in Matched Observational Studies.Journal of computational and graphical statistics : a joint publication of American Statistical Association, Institute of Mathematical Statistics, Interface Foundation of North America · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

B ZhangWharton School, Schools of Nursing and Medicine, University of Pennsylvania.
D S SmallWharton School, Schools of Nursing and Medicine, University of Pennsylvania.
K B LasaterWharton School, Schools of Nursing and Medicine, University of Pennsylvania.
M McHughWharton School, Schools of Nursing and Medicine, University of Pennsylvania.
J H SilberWharton School, Schools of Nursing and Medicine, University of Pennsylvania.
P R RosenbaumWharton School, Schools of Nursing and Medicine, University of Pennsylvania.

Funding

ADVANCED TRAINING IN NURSING OUTCOMES RESEARCHT32NR007104 · NINR · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI JACQUELINE MARGO BROOKS CARTHON, EILEEN T LAKE · 1999 to 2026
$11.6M
The Impact of Changes in Nursing Systems and Models of Care on Patient Outcomes: A Panel StudyR01NR014855 · NINR · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI Matthew D. McHugh · 2014 to 2026
$7.5M
Comparing Quality and Cost of Care Across Nursing EnvironmentsR01NR016019 · NINR · CHILDREN'S HOSP OF PHILADELPHIA · PI MCHUGH, MATTHEW D., SILBER, JEFFREY H · 2016 to 2018
$1.8M
NINR NIH HHS R01 NR014855NINR NIH HHS R01 NR016019NINR NIH HHS T32 NR007104
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Multivariate matching has two goals: (i) to construct treated and control groups that have similar distributions of observed covariates, and (ii) to produce matched pairs or sets that are homogeneous in a few key covariates. When there are only a few binary covariates, both goals may be achieved by matching exactly for these few covariates. Commonly, however, there are many covariates, so goals (i) and (ii) come apart, and must be achieved by different means. As is also true in a randomized experiment, similar distributions can be achieved for a high-dimensional covariate, but close pairs can be achieved for only a few covariates. We introduce a new polynomial-time method for achieving both goals that substantially generalizes several existing methods; in particular, it can minimize the earthmover distance between two marginal distributions. The method involves minimum cost flow optimization in a network built around a tripartite graph, unlike the usual network built around a bipartite graph. In the tripartite graph, treated subjects appear twice, on the far left and the far right, with controls sandwiched between them, and efforts to balance covariates are represented on the right, while efforts to find close individual pairs are represented on the left. In this way, the two efforts may be pursued simultaneously without conflict. The method is applied to our on-going study in the Medicare population of the relationship between superior nursing and sepsis mortality. The match2C package in R implements the method.

Indexed as

earthmover distancefine balancenetwork optimizationoptimal matching

Identifiers

PMID37347087
PMCPMC10281706

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.