Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37347084›Full record

ArticleAyu

Jaiprakash Bholanath Ram, Babita Yadav, V Ashwathykutty, Sophia Jameela, Azeem Ahmad, Saket Ram Thrigulla, Sakshi Sharma, Rakesh K Rana, Richa Singhal, Bhogavalli Chandrasekhara Rao and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ayu. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Jaiprakash Bholanath RamCentral Council for Research in Ayurvedic Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Babita YadavCentral Council for Research in Ayurvedic Sciences, New Delhi, India.
V AshwathykuttyCentral Council for Research in Ayurvedic Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Sophia JameelaCentral Council for Research in Ayurvedic Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Azeem AhmadCentral Council for Research in Ayurvedic Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Saket Ram ThrigullaCentral Council for Research in Ayurvedic Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Sakshi SharmaCARI, New Delhi, India.
Rakesh K RanaCentral Council for Research in Ayurvedic Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Richa SinghalCentral Council for Research in Ayurvedic Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Bhogavalli Chandrasekhara RaoCentral Council for Research in Ayurvedic Sciences, New Delhi, India.
N SrikanthCentral Council for Research in Ayurvedic Sciences, New Delhi, India.
K S DhimanCentral Council for Research in Ayurvedic Sciences, New Delhi, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Materials and methods: A thorough literature search and expert consultations were done to draft the items encompassing the concept of health in Results: The content validity index for items and the scale-level content validity index (S-CVI) were calculated. S-CVI for scale was excellent, with 85% agreement. The S-CVI/universal agreement was 0.45, and S-CVI/Average was 0.95. In inter-rater reliability, the percentage agreement was 73.7%. Pearson correlation coefficient was 0.808 showing a strong correlation. Conclusion: Following appropriate validation, the scale can be widely used in clinical practice to assess the patient's health status, guide the treatment plans, and monitor the progress of the health. It can also be used as a sensitive tool in the research of

Indexed as

Ayurvedahealth assessment toolreliabilitySwasthya assessment scalevalidation

Identifiers

PMID37347084
PMCPMC10281245

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.