ReviewPulmonary circulation2023
Patient perspectives on pulmonary hypertension in the United States: Burdens, expectations, and goals.
Review in Pulmonary circulation, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Understanding the burden of pulmonary arterial hypertension among patients and caregivers through narrative medicine: data from Italian multicentre observational INSPECTIO study.BMJ open respiratory research · 2026Observational
- The Pulmonary Hypertension Global Patient Survey: understanding the experiences and perspectives of patients.ERJ open research · 2025Article
- Real-World Dosing and Persistence of Oral Treprostinil Initiation Strategies in Patients With Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension.Pulmonary circulation · 2025Article
- Diagnostic Delays and Quality of Life in Japanese Patients with Pulmonary Hypertension: A Nationwide Survey.Pulmonary therapy · 2025Article
- Patient Perspectives on Fixed Dose Combination Therapy for Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension: Exploratory Focus Group Research.Pulmonary circulation · 2025Article
- Anxiety and Depression Screening of Youth in Pediatric Pulmonary Hypertension Clinic: A Multi-Center, Cross-Sectional Study.Pulmonary circulation · 2025Article
- Impact of educational intervention and pedometer-based self-monitoring on physical activity levels in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension.Cardiovascular diagnosis and therapy · 2024Article
- Exploring the patient perspective in pulmonary hypertension.The European respiratory journal · 2024Article
- Patient perspectives on pulmonary hypertension in the United States: Burdens, expectations, and goals.Pulmonary circulation · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Pulmonary hypertension (PH) is a life-threatening, debilitating disease caused by increased blood pressure in the pulmonary arteries. As patients living in the United States, we have unique insights into the journey from diagnosis and treatment within the US healthcare system and the significant impact that PH has on our quality of life. While there have recently been advances in PH management, there are several areas of PH care which we feel should be reassessed and improved. Commonly, diagnosis is lengthy and convoluted due to the rarity of the disease and limited knowledge of PH in primary care. There are also barriers to obtaining the right treatment and we feel that a more holistic approach to care is needed. Mental health is commonly overlooked and should be an integral part of patient care, as should elements such as nutritional advice, cardiopulmonary rehabilitation, and sexual health. PH patient associations play a key role in providing social, educational, and financial support to patients and caregivers alongside PH research and advocacy. As patients, we feel that we need to advocate for correct diagnosis, timely referral, and optimal treatment, in addition to overcoming the financial and/or administrative hurdles to obtain these. We propose several future goals to help empower patients to play an active, central role in their care and to improve all aspects of PH management. We advocate for further use of the patient voice in research and clinical development programs, including the use of patient-reported outcomes that have been developed with patient input.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.