SynthesisNagoya journal of medical science2023
Interventions to improve locomotive syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Synthesis in Nagoya journal of medical science, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- The risk factors for development or progression of locomotive syndrome: a systematic review.Nagoya journal of medical science · 2025Pooled it
- Association between Frailty, Locomotive Syndrome, and Participation Frequency in a Long-Term Care Prevention Program among Community-Dwelling Japanese Older Adults: A Sex-Specific Analysis.Annals of geriatric medicine and research · 2025Article
- Effectiveness of physical therapy for locomotive syndrome: A systematic review and meta-analysis protocol.PloS one · 2025Article
- Relationship between physical activity and locomotive syndrome among young and middle-aged Japanese workers.Journal of occupational health · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Locomotive syndrome is a musculoskeletal disease of individuals who are highly likely to require nursing care. There is no systematic review that systematically evaluates and consolidates the findings of randomized controlled trials, although the number of randomized controlled trials considering the intervention effect on locomotive syndrome has been increasing with the spread of the concept. Therefore, this systematic review of randomized controlled trials is aimed at consolidating evidence regarding effective interventions to improve locomotive syndrome. We searched seven databases electronically. Studies were included in this systematic review if the following were met: (1) the articles were randomized controlled trials written in English or Japanese in a peer-reviewed journal, and (2) the clinical evaluation of the locomotive syndrome should include at least one of the following: the stand-up test, two-step test, and 25-question Geriatric Locomotive Function Scale. This systematic review included 10 studies. Several individual papers showed that the intervention group significantly improved the outcome measure for the diagnosis of locomotive syndrome compared with the control group. Only oral glucosamine intake provided sufficient information to conduct a meta-analysis, but the results were not statistically significant. This systematic review and meta-analysis did not provide strong evidence for specific interventions in improving locomotive syndrome, although individual randomized controlled trials have shown that oral intake of glucosamine, electrical stimulation, and exercise could improve locomotive syndrome. We hope that more high-quality randomized controlled exercise intervention trials aimed at improving locomotive syndrome, which is a musculoskeletal dysfunction, will be carried out in the future.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.