Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37346823›Full record

ArticleTranslational journal of the American College of Sports Medicine2021

"Waiving" Goodbye to PE: State Law and School Exemption and Substitution Practices in the United States.

Jamie F Chriqui, Julien Leider, Elizabeth Piekarz-Porter, Wanting Lin, Lindsey Turner, Shannon L Michael, Nancy Brener, Frank Perna

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Translational journal of the American College of Sports Medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Jamie F ChriquiInstitute for Health Research and Policy, University of Illinois Chicago, Chicago, IL.
Julien LeiderInstitute for Health Research and Policy, University of Illinois Chicago, Chicago, IL.
Elizabeth Piekarz-PorterInstitute for Health Research and Policy, University of Illinois Chicago, Chicago, IL.
Wanting LinInstitute for Health Research and Policy, University of Illinois Chicago, Chicago, IL.
Lindsey TurnerCollege of Education, Boise State University, Boise, ID.
Shannon L MichaelDivision of Population Health, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA.
Nancy BrenerDivision of Adolescent and School Health, National Center for HIV, Viral Hepatitis, STD, and TB Prevention, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA.
Frank PernaHealth Promotion Research Branch, Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD.

Funding

Intramural CDC HHS CC999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: The importance of schools providing physical education (PE) and promoting physical activity (PA) and the benefits of PA for children are well documented. However, a majority of students do not get the nationally recommended 60 min of daily PA. Many states grant waivers, substitutions, or exemptions from PE despite national recommendations. This study examined the association between state laws allowing for the use of PE substitutions and exemptions and school-level substitution and exemption practices. Methods: School-level PE exemption and substitution data from the 2014 School Health Policies and Practices Study were linked to state law data from the National Wellness Policy Study and the National Cancer Institute's 2013 Classification of Laws Associated with School Students. The analytic sample included 320 schools located in 42 states. Separate multivariable logistic regression models linked five types of school PE exemptions/substitutions to corresponding state laws, controlling for school characteristics. Results: Overall, 24 of the 42 states had laws addressing PE waivers, exemptions, or substitutions. Schools had higher odds of allowing PE substitutions for school sports (adjusted odds ratio (AOR), 3.59; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.33-9.68), other school activities (AOR, 8.52; 95% CI, 2.90-25.03), and community sports (AOR, 4.30; 95% CI, 1.43-12.96) and allowing exemptions for fitness test scores (AOR, 4.67; 95% CI, 1.49-14.62) or vocational training (AOR, 5.92; 95% CI, 1.04-33.68) if state law allowed it, compared with schools in states that did not allow such practices. Conclusions: Given the connection between PA and beneficial outcomes for children, decision makers, school administrators, practitioners, advocates, and researchers should consider and further examine how PE waiver, exemption, and substitution policies and practices may affect students' PA and related outcomes.

Identifiers

PMID37346823
PMCPMC10282692

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.