Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37346802›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical artificial intelligence2023

Efficient labelling for efficient deep learning: the benefit of a multiple-image-ranking method to generate high volume training data applied to ventricular slice level classification in cardiac MRI.

Sameer Zaman, Kavitha Vimalesvaran, James P Howard, Digby Chappell, Marta Varela, Nicholas S Peters, Darrel P Francis, Anil A Bharath, Nick W F Linton, Graham D Cole

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical artificial intelligence, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Sameer ZamanNational Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1467-8176
Kavitha VimalesvaranNational Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2236-7279
James P HowardNational Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9989-6331
Digby ChappellAI for Healthcare Centre for Doctoral Training, Imperial College London, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4252-8121
Marta VarelaNational Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4057-7851
Nicholas S PetersNational Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3581-8078
Darrel P FrancisNational Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3410-0814
Anil A BharathDepartment of Bioengineering, Imperial College London, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8808-2714
Nick W F LintonImperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5712-849X
Graham D ColeImperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK.

Funding

British Heart Foundation FS/ICRF/22/26039British Heart Foundation RE/18/4/34215British Heart Foundation RG/F/22/110059Department of Health IS-BRC-1215-20013Wellcome Trust 212183
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Getting the most value from expert clinicians' limited labelling time is a major challenge for artificial intelligence (AI) development in clinical imaging. We present a novel method for ground-truth labelling of cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) image data by leveraging multiple clinician experts ranking multiple images on a single ordinal axis, rather than manual labelling of one image at a time. We apply this strategy to train a deep learning (DL) model to classify the anatomical position of CMR images. This allows the automated removal of slices that do not contain the left ventricular (LV) myocardium. Methods: Anonymised LV short-axis slices from 300 random scans (3,552 individual images) were extracted. Each image's anatomical position relative to the LV was labelled using two different strategies performed for 5 hours each: (I) 'one-image-at-a-time': each image labelled according to its position: 'too basal', 'LV', or 'too apical' individually by one of three experts; and (II) 'multiple-image-ranking': three independent experts ordered slices according to their relative position from 'most-basal' to 'most apical' in batches of eight until each image had been viewed at least 3 times. Two convolutional neural networks were trained for a three-way classification task (each model using data from one labelling strategy). The models' performance was evaluated by accuracy, F1-score, and area under the receiver operating characteristics curve (ROC AUC). Results: After excluding images with artefact, 3,323 images were labelled by both strategies. The model trained using labels from the 'multiple-image-ranking strategy' performed better than the model using the 'one-image-at-a-time' labelling strategy (accuracy 86% Conclusions: We present proof of concept that, given the same clinician labelling effort, comparing multiple images side-by-side using a 'multiple-image-ranking' strategy achieves ground truth labels for DL more accurately than by classifying images individually. We demonstrate a potential clinical application: the automatic removal of unrequired CMR images. This leads to increased efficiency by focussing human and machine attention on images which are needed to answer clinical questions.

Indexed as

clinical imagingconvolution neural network (CNN)data labellingDeep learning (DL)ground truth

Identifiers

PMID37346802
PMCPMC7614685

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.