ArticleJournal of inflammation research2023
Clinical Utility of the Neutrophil-to-Bilirubin Ratio in the Detection of Disease Activity in Ulcerative Colitis.
Article in Journal of inflammation research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- [Characteristics and clinical significance of neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio in patients with sudden sensorineural hearing loss].Lin chuang er bi yan hou tou jing wai ke za zhi = Journal of clinical otorhinolaryngology head and neck surgery · 2025Article
- Changes in Serum Bilirubin and Total Bile Acids During Biologic Therapy in Patients with Ulcerative Colitis: A Retrospective Study.Journal of inflammation research · 2025Article
- Crosstalk between neutrophil extracellular traps and gut microbiota in ulcerative colitis: traditional Chinese medicine strategies.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Ulcerative colitis (UC) is a chronic relapsing remitting form of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Current disease monitoring includes evaluation of symptoms, fecal calprotectin, and colonoscopy. Due to limited availability of the latter two modalities in China, we sought a readily available, inexpensive, disease monitoring laboratory assessment. We recently identified a novel serological index (the neutrophil-to-bilirubin ratio, NBR) for monitoring disease activity in Crohn's disease. However, the clinical significance has not been evaluated in UC. Here, we aimed to verify the hypothesis that NBR might be useful in monitoring clinical and endoscopic activity in patients with UC. Methods: To test our hypothesis, we conducted a single-center, retrospective study including a total of 188 patients with UC and 145 non-IBD controls. NBR was calculated to determine its practical value in monitoring disease activity (including clinical and endoscopic activity). Disease activity of UC was determined by the partial Mayo score and the Mayo endoscopic score (MES) system. Results: NBR was significantly higher in patients with UC than that in controls (12.10, IQR: 9.85-16.69 versus 5.06, IQR: 3.94-6.55; p < 0.001) and showed positive correlations with clinical and endoscopic disease activity in UC. Additionally, NBR was significantly lower in patients with endoscopic mucosal healing (MH) than that in those without endoscopic MH (8.81, IQR: 6.67-11.67 versus 13.51, IQR: 11.04-18.71; p < 0.001). Serial evaluation of NBR in a subset of patients demonstrated that NBR was significantly decreased during the MH stage compared with that during the endoscopically active stage. Conclusion: Our study suggests that NBR may be a promising candidate for assessing disease activity in UC, with potential for widespread clinical use and significant clinical implications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.