ArticleOrthopaedic journal of sports medicine2023
Open Versus Arthroscopic Latarjet for Recurrent Anterior Shoulder Instability: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
Article in Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- Moderate to high levels of spin in studies comparing open and arthroscopic Latarjet procedures for anterior shoulder instability: A systematic review from the LaTour Group.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2026Pooled it
- Shoulder ligamentoplasty, arthroscopic Latarjet, dynamic anterior stabilization, and arthroscopic trillat for the treatment of shoulder instability: a systematic review of original studies on surgical techniques.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2025Pooled it
- Salvage Latarjet may provide worse outcomes in terms of recurrent instability and returning to sports compared to primary Latarjet: a systematic review of comparative studies.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2024Pooled it
- Open Hill-Sachs remplissage associated with glenoid bone block: a single deltopectoral approach.JSES reviews, reports, and techniques · 2026Article
- Modified arthroscopic suture-button Latarjet procedure for recurrent anterior shoulder instability: 9-Year minimum follow-up.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2026Article
- Open modified-Latarjet procedure with suture-anchor-button fixation through a full anterior approach.JSES reviews, reports, and techniques · 2025Article
- Current Research Regarding the Latarjet Procedure Is Focused on Technical Refinements, Fixation Alternatives, and Individualized Surgical Planning.Arthroscopy, sports medicine, and rehabilitation · 2025Article
- Modified Suture Button Latarjet Procedure With Coracoacromial Ligament and Pectoralis Minor Preservation: An Approach to Avoid Subscapularis Split.Arthroscopy techniques · 2025Article
- Article
- Surgical Variations of the Modified Latarjet Procedure: A Literature Review and Video-Illustrated Surgical Technique.Cureus · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The open Latarjet (OL) procedure and arthroscopic Latarjet (AL) procedure are able to treat recurrent anterior shoulder instability (RASI) with high success rates. Purpose: To evaluate the clinical efficacy and postoperative revisions and complications between the OL and AL procedures in the treatment of RASI. Study Design: Systematic review; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: MEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane Library were searched to retrieve and include cohort studies comparing the OL and AL procedures for RASI. Clinical outcomes were compared, and results were reported as odds ratios (ORs) or mean differences (MDs) with 95% CIs. Results: Eleven clinical trials with 1217 patients were included. There were no differences between the procedures in pain score, Rowe score, Walch-Duplay score, external rotation, persistent apprehension, instability, recurrence, revisions attributed to recurrent instability, overall complications, wound infection, hematoma, graft complications, screw-related complications, or osteoarthritis. When compared with the OL procedure, the AL procedure had a significantly lower nonunion rate (OR, 9.92; 95% CI, 1.71 to 57.71; Conclusion: For most outcome measures, no difference was seen between the OL and AL procedures. The AL procedure had a lower Western Ontario Shoulder Instability Index score and a higher revision rate and appeared to have a significant learning curve. However, the AL procedure resulted in a lower nonunion rate.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.