ArticlePeerJ. Computer science2023
Early detection of student degree-level academic performance using educational data mining.
Article in PeerJ. Computer science, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Development of a prediction model for student teaching satisfaction based on 10 machine learning algorithms.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Higher educational institutes generate massive amounts of student data. This data needs to be explored in depth to better understand various facets of student learning behavior. The educational data mining approach has given provisions to extract useful and non-trivial knowledge from large collections of student data. Using the educational data mining method of classification, this research analyzes data of 291 university students in an attempt to predict student performance at the end of a 4-year degree program. A student segmentation framework has also been proposed to identify students at various levels of academic performance. Coupled with the prediction model, the proposed segmentation framework provides a useful mechanism for devising pedagogical policies to increase the quality of education by mitigating academic failure and encouraging higher performance. The experimental results indicate the effectiveness of the proposed framework and the applicability of classifying students into multiple performance levels using a small subset of courses being taught in the initial two years of the 4-year degree program.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.