ArticlePeerJ. Computer science2023
Neural noiseprint transfer: a generic noiseprint-based counter forensics framework.
Article in PeerJ. Computer science, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A noiseprint is a camera-related artifact that can be extracted from an image to serve as a powerful tool for several forensic tasks. The noiseprint is built with a deep learning data-driven approach that is trained to produce unique noise residuals with clear traces of camera-related artifacts. This data-driven approach results in a complex relationship that governs the noiseprint with the input image, making it challenging to attack. This article proposes a novel neural noiseprint transfer framework for noiseprint-based counter forensics. Given an authentic image and a forged image, the proposed framework synthesizes a newly generated image that is visually imperceptible to the forged image, but its noiseprint is very close to the noiseprint of the authentic one, to make it appear as if it is authentic and thus renders the noiseprint-based forensics ineffective. Based on deep content and noiseprint representations of the forged and authentic images, we implement the proposed framework in two different approaches. The first is an optimization-based approach that synthesizes the generated image by minimizing the difference between its content representation with the content representation of the forged image while, at the same time, minimizing the noiseprint representation difference from the authentic one. The second approach is a noiseprint injection-based approach, which first trains a novel neural noiseprint-injector network that can inject the noiseprint of an image into another one. Then, the trained noiseprint-injector is used to inject the noiseprint from the authentic image into the forged one to produce the generated image. The proposed approaches are generic and do not require training for specific images or camera models. Both approaches are evaluated on several datasets against two common forensic tasks: the forgery localization and camera source identification tasks. In the two tasks, the proposed approaches are able to significantly reduce several forensic accuracy scores compared with two noiseprint-based forensics methods while at the same time producing high-fidelity images. On the DSO-1 dataset, the reduction in the forensic accuracy scores has an average of 75%, while the produced images have an average PSNR of 31.5 dB and SSIM of 0.9. The source code of the proposed approaches is available on GitHub (https://github.com/ahmed-elliethy/nnt).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.