Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37346680›Full record

ArticlePeerJ. Computer science2023

The critical node detection problem in hypergraphs using weighted node degree centrality.

Tamás-Zsolt Képes

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PeerJ. Computer science, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Tamás-Zsolt KépesComputer Science, Babes-Bolyai University of Cluj-Napoca, Cluj-Napoca, Romania.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Network analysis is an indispensable part of today's academic field. Among the different types of networks, the more complex hypergraphs can provide an excellent challenge and new angles for analysis. This study proposes a variant of the critical node detection problem for hypergraphs using weighted node degree centrality as a form of importance metric. An analysis is done on both generated synthetic networks and real-world derived data on the topic of United States House and Senate committees, using a newly designed algorithm. The numerical results show that the combination of the critical node detection on hypergraphs with the weighted node degree centrality provides promising results and the topic is worth exploring further.

Indexed as

Centrality measuresCritical nodesGenetic algorithmGraph theoryHypergraphsNetwork analysisNode detection

Identifiers

PMID37346680
PMCPMC10280579

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.