Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37346670›Full record

ArticlePeerJ. Computer science2023

Pedestrian walking speed monitoring at street scale by an in-flight drone.

Dan Jiao, Teng Fei

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PeerJ. Computer science, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Dan JiaoSchool of Resource and Environmental Sciences, Wuhan University, Wuhan, Hubei, China.
Teng FeiSchool of Resource and Environmental Sciences, Wuhan University, Wuhan, Hubei, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The walking speed of pedestrians is not only a reflection of one's physiological condition and health status but also a key parameter in the evaluation of the service level of urban facilities and traffic engineering applications, which is important for urban design and planning. Currently, the three main ways to obtain walking speed are based on trails, wearable devices, and images. The first two cannot be popularized in larger open areas, while the image-based approach requires multiple cameras to cooperate in order to extract the walking speed of an entire street, which is costly. In this study, a method for extracting the pedestrian walking speed at a street scale from in-flight drone video is proposed. Pedestrians are detected and tracked by You Only Look Once version 5 (YOLOv5) and Simple Online and Realtime Tracking with a Deep Association Metric (DeepSORT) algorithms in the video taken from a flying unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV). The distance that pedestrians traveled related to the ground per fixed time interval is calculated using a combined algorithm of Scale-Invariant Feature Transform (SIFT) and random sample consensus (RANSAC) followed by a geometric correction algorithm. Compared to ground truth values, it shows that 90.5% of the corrected walking speed predictions have an absolute error of less than 0.1 m/s. Overall, the method we have proposed is accurate and feasible. A particular advantage of this method is the ability to accurately predict the walking speed of pedestrians without keeping the flight speed of the UAV constant, facilitating accurate measurements by non-specialist technicians. In addition, because of the unrestricted flight range of the UAV, the method can be applied to the entire scale of the street, which assists in a better understanding of how the settings and layouts of urban affect people's behavior.

Indexed as

Pedestrian identificationPedestrian trackingUAVWalking speed

Identifiers

PMID37346670
PMCPMC10280686

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.