ArticlePeerJ. Computer science2023
Application of graph auto-encoders based on regularization in recommendation algorithms.
Article in PeerJ. Computer science, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Ensemble graph auto-encoders for clustering and link prediction.PeerJ. Computer science · 2025Article
- Fast binary logistic regression.PeerJ. Computer science · 2025Article
- Pick-up point recommendation strategy based on user incentive mechanism.PeerJ. Computer science · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Social networking has become a hot topic, in which recommendation algorithms are the most important. Recently, the combination of deep learning and recommendation algorithms has attracted considerable attention. The integration of autoencoders and graph convolutional neural networks, while providing an effective solution to the shortcomings of traditional algorithms, fails to take into account user preferences and risks over-smoothing as the number of encoder layers increases. Therefore, we introduce L1 and L2 regularization techniques and fuse them linearly to address user preferences and over-smoothing. In addition, the presence of a large amount of noisy data in the graph data has an impact on feature extraction. To our best knowledge, most existing models do not account for noise and address the problem of noisy data in graph data. Thus, we introduce the idea of denoising autoencoders into graph autoencoders, which can effectively address the noise problem. We demonstrate the capability of the proposed model on four widely used datasets and experimentally demonstrate that our model is more competitive by improving up to 1.3, 1.4, and 1.2, respectively, on the edge prediction task.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.