Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37346628›Full record

ArticlePeerJ. Computer science2023

Fake news detection in Urdu language using machine learning.

Muhammad Shoaib Farooq, Ansar Naseem, Furqan Rustam, Imran Ashraf

Abstract readNews
In one paragraph

Article in PeerJ. Computer science, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Muhammad Shoaib FarooqDepartment of Computer Science, University of Management and Technology, Lahore, Pakistan.
Ansar NaseemDepartment of Computer Science, University of Management and Technology, Lahore, Pakistan.
Furqan RustamDepartment of Software Engineering, University of Management & Technology, Lahore, Lahore, Pakistan.
Imran AshrafInformation and Communication Engineering, Yeungnam University, Gyeongsan si, South Korea.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

With the rise of social media, the dissemination of forged content and news has been on the rise. Consequently, fake news detection has emerged as an important research problem. Several approaches have been presented to discriminate fake news from real news, however, such approaches lack robustness for multi-domain datasets, especially within the context of Urdu news. In addition, some studies use machine-translated datasets using English to Urdu Google translator and manual verification is not carried out. This limits the wide use of such approaches for real-world applications. This study investigates these issues and proposes fake news classier for Urdu news. The dataset has been collected covering nine different domains and constitutes 4097 news. Experiments are performed using the term frequency-inverse document frequency (TF-IDF) and a bag of words (BoW) with the combination of n-grams. The major contribution of this study is the use of feature stacking, where feature vectors of preprocessed text and verbs extracted from the preprocessed text are combined. Support vector machine, k-nearest neighbor, and ensemble models like random forest (RF) and extra tree (ET) were used for bagging while stacking was applied with ET and RF as base learners with logistic regression as the meta learner. To check the robustness of models, fivefold and independent set testing were employed. Experimental results indicate that stacking achieves 93.39%, 88.96%, 96.33%, 86.2%, and 93.17% scores for accuracy, specificity, sensitivity, MCC, ROC, and F1 score, respectively.

Indexed as

Ensemble learningFake news detectionMachine learningUrdu fake news

Identifiers

PMID37346628
PMCPMC10280395

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.