Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37346617›Full record

ArticlePeerJ. Computer science2023

A comprehensive survey of techniques for developing an Arabic question answering system.

Yazeed Alkhurayyif, Abdul Rahaman Wahab Sait

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PeerJ. Computer science, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Yazeed AlkhurayyifDepartment of Computer Science, Al Quwayiyah College of Sciences and Humanities, Shaqra University, Saudi Arabia.
Abdul Rahaman Wahab SaitDepartment of Documents and Archive, Center of Documents and Administrative Communication, King Faisal University, Al-Ahsa, Saudi Arabia.
King Faisal University · SAShaqra University · SA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The question-answering system (QAS) aims to produce a response to a query using information from a text corpus. Arabic is a complex language. However, it has more than 450 million native speakers across the globe. The Saudi Arabian government encourages organizations to automate their routine activities to provide adequate services to their stakeholders. The performance of current Arabic QASs is limited to the specific domain. An effective QAS retrieves relevant responses from structured and unstructured data based on the user query. Many QAS studies categorized QASs according to factors, including user queries, dataset characteristics, and the nature of the responses. A more comprehensive examination of QASs is required to improve the QAS development according to the present QAS requirements. The current literature presents the features and classifications of the Arabic QAS. There is a lack of studies to report the techniques of Arabic QAS development. Thus, this study suggests a systematic literature review of strategies for developing Arabic QAS. A total of 617 articles were collected, and 40 papers were included in the proposed review. The outcome reveals the importance of the dataset and the deep learning techniques used to improve the performance of the QAS. The existing systems depend on supervised learning methods that lower QAS performance. In addition, the recent development of machine learning techniques encourages researchers to develop unsupervised QAS.

Indexed as

Arabic chatbotArabic question-answering systemDeep learningInteractive question-answering systemMachine learning

Identifiers

PMID37346617
PMCPMC10280590
OpenAlexW4379882224

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.