Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37346616›Full record

ArticlePeerJ. Computer science2023

Global analysis of Twitter communication in corporate social responsibility area: sustainability, climate change, and waste management.

Lucie Kvasničková Stanislavská, Ladislav Pilař, Xhesilda Vogli, Tomas Hlavsa, Kateřina Kuralová, Abby Feenstra, Lucie Pilařová, Richard Hartman, Joanna Rosak-Szyrocka

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PeerJ. Computer science, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Lucie Kvasničková StanislavskáDepartment of Management, Faculty of Economics and Management, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Prague, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0001-7360-8509
Ladislav PilařDepartment of Management, Faculty of Economics and Management, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Prague, Czech Republic.
Xhesilda VogliDepartment of Management, Faculty of Economics and Management, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Prague, Czech Republic.
Tomas HlavsaDepartment of Statistics, Faculty of Economics and Management, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Prague, Czech Republic.
Kateřina KuralováDepartment of Management, Faculty of Economics and Management, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Prague, Czech Republic.
Abby FeenstraManagement Club at the Faculty of Economics and Management, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Prague, Czech Republic.
Lucie PilařováDepartment of Management, Faculty of Economics and Management, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Prague, Czech Republic.
Richard HartmanDepartment of Management, Faculty of Economics and Management, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Prague, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0001-8214-6991
Joanna Rosak-SzyrockaDepartment of Production Engineering and Safety, Faculty of Management, Czestochowa University of Technology, Czestochowa, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-5548-6787

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Many people now consider social media to be an integral part of their daily routines, which has enabled companies to implement successful corporate social responsibility campaigns through these platforms. The direct interaction with stakeholders offered by social media helps companies to build understanding, trust, and their image. The aim of this study was to identify key topics and trends communicated in connection with corporate social responsibility on the Twitter social network from 2017 to 2022. Analysis of 520,638 tweets by 168,134 unique users identified a predominance of environment-related topics: Sustainability, Climate Change, and Waste management. However, Charity remains the largest single topic. Based on the trend analysis, the areas of ESG, Social Impact, and Charity were identified as growth areas in communication, while Green and Philanthropy, on the other hand, were identified as decreasing.

Indexed as

CharityCorporate social responsibilityESGSentiment analysisSocial media analysisTwitter

Identifiers

PMID37346616
PMCPMC10280435

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.