Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37346564›Full record

ArticlePeerJ. Computer science2023

Decoding of the neural representation of the visual RGB color model.

Yijia Wu, Yanjing Mao, Kaiqiang Feng, Donglai Wei, Liang Song

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PeerJ. Computer science, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Yijia WuFudan University, Fudan University, ShangHai, YangPu, China.
Yanjing MaoFudan University, Fudan University, ShangHai, YangPu, China.
Kaiqiang FengFudan University, Fudan University, ShangHai, YangPu, China.
Donglai WeiFudan University, Fudan University, ShangHai, YangPu, China.
Liang SongFudan University, Fudan University, ShangHai, YangPu, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

RGB color is a basic visual feature. Here we use machine learning and visual evoked potential (VEP) of electroencephalogram (EEG) data to investigate the decoding features of the time courses and space location that extract it, and whether they depend on a common brain cortex channel. We show that RGB color information can be decoded from EEG data and, with the task-irrelevant paradigm, features can be decoded across fast changes in VEP stimuli. These results are consistent with the theory of both event-related potential (ERP) and P300 mechanisms. The latency on time course is shorter and more temporally precise for RGB color stimuli than P300, a result that does not depend on a task-relevant paradigm, suggesting that RGB color is an updating signal that separates visual events. Meanwhile, distribution features are evident for the brain cortex of EEG signal, providing a space correlate of RGB color in classification accuracy and channel location. Finally, space decoding of RGB color depends on the channel classification accuracy and location obtained through training and testing EEG data. The result is consistent with channel power value distribution discharged by both VEP and electrophysiological stimuli mechanisms.

Indexed as

ColorDecodingEEGMachine learningRGBVisual

Identifiers

PMID37346564
PMCPMC10280385

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.