Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37346556›Full record

ArticlePeerJ. Computer science2023

What people think about fast food: opinions analysis and LDA modeling on fast food restaurants using unstructured tweets.

Muhammad Mujahid, Furqan Rustam, Fahad Alasim, MuhammadAbubakar Siddique, Imran Ashraf

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PeerJ. Computer science, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Muhammad MujahidDepartment of Computer Science, Khwaja Fareed University of Engineering and Information Technology, Raheem Yar Khan, Pakistan.
Furqan RustamSchool of Computer Science, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.
Fahad AlasimDepartment of Industrial Engineering, College of Engineering, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
MuhammadAbubakar SiddiqueDepartment of Computer Science and Information Technology, Ghazi University, Dera Ghazi Khan, Punjab, Pakistan.
Imran AshrafInformation and Communication Engineering, Yeungnam University, Gyeongsan si, South Korea.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

With the rise of social media platforms, sharing reviews has become a social norm in today's modern society. People check customer views on social networking sites about different fast food restaurants and food items before visiting the restaurants and ordering food. Restaurants can compete to better the quality of their offered items or services by carefully analyzing the feedback provided by customers. People tend to visit restaurants with a higher number of positive reviews. Accordingly, manually collecting feedback from customers for every product is a labor-intensive process; the same is true for sentiment analysis. To overcome this, we use sentiment analysis, which automatically extracts meaningful information from the data. Existing studies predominantly focus on machine learning models. As a consequence, the performance analysis of deep learning models is neglected primarily and of the deep ensemble models especially. To this end, this study adopts several deep ensemble models including Bi long short-term memory and gated recurrent unit (BiLSTM+GRU), LSTM+GRU, GRU+recurrent neural network (GRU+RNN), and BiLSTM+RNN models using self-collected unstructured tweets. The performance of lexicon-based methods is compared with deep ensemble models for sentiment classification. In addition, the study makes use of Latent Dirichlet Allocation (LDA) modeling for topic analysis. For experiments, the tweets for the top five fast food serving companies are collected which include KFC, Pizza Hut, McDonald's, Burger King, and Subway. Experimental results reveal that deep ensemble models yield better results than the lexicon-based approach and BiLSTM+GRU obtains the highest accuracy of 95.31% for three class problems. Topic modeling indicates that the highest number of negative sentiments are represented for Subway restaurants with high-intensity negative words. The majority of the people (49%) remain neutral regarding the choice of fast food, 31% seem to like fast food while the rest (20%) dislike fast food.

Indexed as

Ensemble modelLatent Dirichlet AllocationSentiment analysisTextBlob

Identifiers

PMID37346556
PMCPMC10280231

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.