ArticlePeerJ. Computer science2023
What people think about fast food: opinions analysis and LDA modeling on fast food restaurants using unstructured tweets.
Article in PeerJ. Computer science, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Analyzing patients satisfaction level for medical services using twitter data.PeerJ. Computer science · 2024Article
- Detection of cyberhate speech towards female sport in the Arabic Xsphere.PeerJ. Computer science · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
With the rise of social media platforms, sharing reviews has become a social norm in today's modern society. People check customer views on social networking sites about different fast food restaurants and food items before visiting the restaurants and ordering food. Restaurants can compete to better the quality of their offered items or services by carefully analyzing the feedback provided by customers. People tend to visit restaurants with a higher number of positive reviews. Accordingly, manually collecting feedback from customers for every product is a labor-intensive process; the same is true for sentiment analysis. To overcome this, we use sentiment analysis, which automatically extracts meaningful information from the data. Existing studies predominantly focus on machine learning models. As a consequence, the performance analysis of deep learning models is neglected primarily and of the deep ensemble models especially. To this end, this study adopts several deep ensemble models including Bi long short-term memory and gated recurrent unit (BiLSTM+GRU), LSTM+GRU, GRU+recurrent neural network (GRU+RNN), and BiLSTM+RNN models using self-collected unstructured tweets. The performance of lexicon-based methods is compared with deep ensemble models for sentiment classification. In addition, the study makes use of Latent Dirichlet Allocation (LDA) modeling for topic analysis. For experiments, the tweets for the top five fast food serving companies are collected which include KFC, Pizza Hut, McDonald's, Burger King, and Subway. Experimental results reveal that deep ensemble models yield better results than the lexicon-based approach and BiLSTM+GRU obtains the highest accuracy of 95.31% for three class problems. Topic modeling indicates that the highest number of negative sentiments are represented for Subway restaurants with high-intensity negative words. The majority of the people (49%) remain neutral regarding the choice of fast food, 31% seem to like fast food while the rest (20%) dislike fast food.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.