Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37346517›Full record

ArticlePeerJ. Computer science2023

Adaptive visual detection of industrial product defects.

Haigang Zhang, Dong Wang, Zhibin Chen, Ronghui Pan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PeerJ. Computer science, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Haigang ZhangShenzhen Polytechnic, Shenzhen, China.
Dong WangShenzhen Polytechnic, Shenzhen, China.
Zhibin ChenUniversity of Science and Technology Liaoning, Anshan, China.
Ronghui PanShenzhen Polytechnic, Shenzhen, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Visual inspection of the appearance defects on industrial products has always been a research hotspot pursued by industry and academia. Due to the lack of samples in the industrial defect dataset and the serious class imbalance, deep learning technology cannot be directly applied to industrial defect visual inspection to meet the real application needs. Transfer learning is a good choice to deal with insufficient samples. However, cross-dataset bias is unavoidable during simple knowledge transfer. We noticed that the appearance defects of industrial products are similar, and most defects can be classified as stains or texture jumps, which provides a research basis for building a universal and adaptive industrial defect detection model. In this article, based on the idea of model-agnostic meta-learning (MAML), we propose an adaptive industrial defect detection model through learning from multiple known industrial defect datasets and then transfer it to the novel anomaly detection tasks. In addition, the Siamese network is used to extract differential features to minimize the influence of defect types on model generalization, and can also highlight defect features and improve model detection performance. At the same time, we add a coordinate attention mechanism to the model, which realizes the feature enhancement of the region of interest in terms of two coordinate dimensions. In the simulation experiments, we construct and publish a visual defect dataset of injection molded bottle cups, termed BC defects, which can complement existing industrial defect visual data benchmarks. Simulation results based on BC defects dataset and other public datasets have demonstrated the effectiveness of the proposed general visual detection model for industrial defects. The dataset and code are available at https://github.com/zhg-SZPT/MeDetection.

Indexed as

Convolutional neural networkIndustrial visual inspectionModel-agnostic meta-learning

Identifiers

PMID37346517
PMCPMC10280690

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.