Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37346510›Full record

ArticlePeerJ. Computer science2023

Application of interval type-2 fuzzy logic and type-1 fuzzy logic-based approaches to social networks for spam detection with combined feature capabilities.

İsmail Atacak, Oğuzhan Çıtlak, İbrahim Alper Doğru

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PeerJ. Computer science, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
4.6field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

İsmail AtacakIoTLab, Department of Computer Engineering, Faculty of Technology, Gazi University, Ankara, Turkey.
Oğuzhan ÇıtlakGraduate School of Natural and Applied Sciences, Gazi University Central Campus, Faculty of Technology, Teknikokullar, Gazi University, Ankara, Turkey.
İbrahim Alper DoğruIoTLab, Department of Computer Engineering, Faculty of Technology, Gazi University, Ankara, Turkey.
Gazi University · TR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Social networks are large platforms that allow their users to interact with each other on the Internet. Today, the widespread use of social networks has made them vulnerable to malicious use through different methods such as fake accounts and spam. As a result, many social network users are exposed to the harmful effects of spam accounts created by malicious people. Although Twitter, one of the most popular social networking platforms, uses spam filters to protect its users from the harmful effects of spam, these filters are insufficient to detect spam accounts that exhibit new methods and behaviours. That's why on social networking platforms like Twitter, it has become a necessity to use robust and more dynamic methods to detect spam accounts. Methods: Fuzzy logic (FL) based approaches, as they are the models such that generate results by interpreting the data obtained based on heuristics viewpoint according to past experiences, they can provide robust and dynamic solutions in spam detection, as in many application areas. For this purpose, a data set was created by collecting data on the twitter platform for spam detection. In the study, fuzzy logic-based classification approaches are suggested for spam detection. In the first stage of the proposed method, a data set with extracted attributes was obtained by applying normalization and crowdsourcing approaches to the raw data obtained from Twitter. In the next stage, as a process of the data preprocessing step, six attributes in the binary form in the data set were subjected to a rating-based transformation and combined with the other real-valued attribute to create a database to be used in spam detection. Classification process inputs were obtained by applying the fisher-score method, one of the commonly used filter-based methods, to the data set obtained in the second stage. In the last stage, the data were classified based on FL based approaches according to the obtained inputs. As FL approaches, four different Mamdani and Sugeno fuzzy inference systems based on interval type-1 and Interval Type-2 were used. Finally, in the classification phase, four different machine learning (ML) approaches including support vector machine (SVM), Bayesian point machine (BPM), logistic regression (LR) and average perceptron (Avr Prc) methods were used to test the effectiveness of these approaches in detecting spam. Results: Experimental results were obtained by applying different FL and ML based approaches on the data set created in the study. As a result of the experiments, the Interval Type-2 Mamdani fuzzy inference system (IT2M-FIS) provided the highest performance with an accuracy of 0.955, a recall of 0.967, an F-score 0.962 and an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.971. However, it has been observed that FL-based spam models have a higher performance than ML-based spam models in terms of metrics including accuracy, recall, F-score and AUC values.

Indexed as

Interval type-2 fuzzy logicMachine learningSocial networkSpam detectionType-1 fuzzy logic

Identifiers

PMID37346510
PMCPMC10280623
OpenAlexW4366687537

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.