ArticlePeerJ. Computer science2023
A novel hybrid algorithm based on Harris Hawks for tumor feature gene selection.
Article in PeerJ. Computer science, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- A novel two-stage feature selection method based on random forest and improved genetic algorithm for enhancing classification in machine learning.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Advances in Zeroing Neural Networks: Bio-Inspired Structures, Performance Enhancements, and Applications.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Enhancing load frequency control and automatic voltage regulation in Interconnected power systems using the Walrus optimization algorithm.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- An improved equilibrium optimization algorithm for feature selection problem in network intrusion detection.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- A Survey on Biomimetic and Intelligent Algorithms with Applications.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- A new parallel multi-objective Harris hawk algorithm for predicting the mortality of COVID-19 patients.PeerJ. Computer science · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Gene expression data are often used to classify cancer genes. In such high-dimensional datasets, however, only a few feature genes are closely related to tumors. Therefore, it is important to accurately select a subset of feature genes with high contributions to cancer classification. Methods: In this article, a new three-stage hybrid gene selection method is proposed that combines a variance filter, extremely randomized tree and Harris Hawks (VEH). In the first stage, we evaluated each gene in the dataset through the variance filter and selected the feature genes that meet the variance threshold. In the second stage, we use extremely randomized tree to further eliminate irrelevant genes. Finally, we used the Harris Hawks algorithm to select the gene subset from the previous two stages to obtain the optimal feature gene subset. Results: We evaluated the proposed method using three different classifiers on eight published microarray gene expression datasets. The results showed a 100% classification accuracy for VEH in gastric cancer, acute lymphoblastic leukemia and ovarian cancer, and an average classification accuracy of 95.33% across a variety of other cancers. Compared with other advanced feature selection algorithms, VEH has obvious advantages when measured by many evaluation criteria.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.