ArticleFrontiers in physiology2023
Contemporary views on the future of physiology-a report from the 2019 P-MIG focus group.
Article in Frontiers in physiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Serinol-Modified 1,8-Naphthalimide Fluorescent Probe for Selective Detection of H₂S in Human Serum and Hypertensive Patients.Journal of fluorescence · 2026Article
- Impressions on European physiology education and research-A quick view from the Portuguese experience.Physiological reports · 2024Article
- Hydrogen Sulfide: A Versatile Molecule and Therapeutic Target in Health and Diseases.Biomolecules · 2024Review
- Charting the course of Physiology within the post-Bologna European higher education area: Insights from Portugal.Physiological reports · 2024Article
- Hydrogen Sulfide: An Emerging Regulator of Oxidative Stress and Cellular Homeostasis-A Comprehensive One-Year Review.Antioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Physiologists are seen as professionals with a unique understanding of life, health, and disease, essential to the progression of knowledge regarding human functions and health. Among these experts however, the thematic of the "Future of Physiology" has been regularly present in the agenda of physiology organizations around the world as various uncertainties about teaching and research in human physiology emerged. The Physiology Majors Interest Group (P-MIG) 2019 meeting provided the occasion for some strategic reasoning and planning, aiming to identify the trends that might drive future changes in human physiology. Twelve physiologists, all experts in different areas of Physiology research and teaching, nearly all based in North America, volunteered to participate in this focus group. The session was audio recorded. A verbatim transcript of the recording was then analyzed through thematic analysis, aiming to identify the most relevant themes for the future of Physiology and how these themes might unfold. The group concluded that a shared consciousness on general goals is present, meaning to preserve and develop the interdisciplinary/integrative nature, to promote more innovative teaching/learning practices, and to acknowledge technology as the main catalyst for research and teaching innovation and progress. This consciousness was present in all participants. The group also concluded that transformation will likely need to be more effective, and should involve the Physiological Societies and organizations around the world. Special emphasis was placed on the need to share common competences for curriculum definition, common guidance for teaching practice, and common assessment procedures, with particular attention recommended toward science communication.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.