Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37346481›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in physiology2023

Avian opioid peptides: evolutionary considerations, functional roles and a challenge to address critical questions.

Krystyna Pierzchała-Koziec, Colin G Scanes

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in physiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Krystyna Pierzchała-KoziecDepartment of Animal Physiology and Endocrinology, University of Agriculture in Krakow, Kraków, Poland.
Colin G ScanesColin G. Scanes, Department of Biological Science, University of Wisconsin Milwaukee, Milwaukee, WI, United States.
University of Agriculture in Krakow · PLUniversity of Wisconsin–Milwaukee · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The present review considers the putative hormonal opioid peptides in birds. In birds and all other vertebrates, there are four opioid related genes encoding a series of peptides. These genes are, respectively, proenkephalin (PENK), prodynorphin (PDYN), pronociceptin (PNOC) and proopiomelanocortin (POMC). Proenkephalin (PENK) encodes Met- and Leu-enkephalin together with peptides containing met enkephalin motifs in birds, mammals and reptiles. Proopiomelanocortin (POMC) encodes β endorphin together with adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH), and melanocyte stimulating hormone (MSH). Prodynorphin (PDYN) encoding dynorphins A and B with α- and β-neoendorphins together intermediate polypeptides across the vertebrates. Pronociceptin (PNOC) encodes nociceptin together with possibly putative avian nocistatin and a non-opioid peptide derived from the C terminal of pronociceptin. There is a high degree of identity in the sequences of enkephalin peptides, dynorphin-A and B and nociceptin in birds and, to a less extent, across vertebrates. The opioid peptides exert effects related to pain together with other biological actions such as growth/development acting via a series of opioid receptors. What is unclear, particularly in birds, is the biological roles and interactions (additivity, antagonistic and synergistic) for the individual opioid peptides, the processing of the prohormones in different tissues and the physiological relevance of the different peptides and, particularly, of the circulating forms.

Indexed as

birdschickendynorphinenkephalinnociceptin

Identifiers

PMID37346481
PMCPMC10280075
OpenAlexW4379535609

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.