Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37346471›Full record

Trial reportClinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)2023

Endothelial Cell Loss Following Cataract Surgery Using Continuous Curvilinear Capsulorhexis or Precision Pulse Capsulotomy.

Mark C Vital, Kevin Y Jong, Clarise E Trinh, Tomy Starck, David Sretavan

Open access · goldAbstract readCase ReportsClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Comparison of the clinical outcomes after manual capsulorhexis on one eye and precision pulse capsulotomy on the other eye.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Mark C VitalHouston Eye Associates, Houston, TX, USA.
Kevin Y JongHouston Eye Associates, Houston, TX, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4984-8283
Clarise E TrinhHouston Eye Associates, Houston, TX, USA.ORCID 0009-0009-8723-3723
Tomy StarckUltraVision, San Antonio, TX, USA.
David SretavanCentricity Vision Inc., Carlsbad, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9355-6934
Houston Eye Associates · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: To compare endothelial cell density (ECD), percentage of hexagonal cells (%Hex) and coefficient of variation (CV) in cell size following lens cataract surgery with phacoemulsification performed using Continuous Curvilinear Capsulorhexis (CCC) or Precision Pulse Capsulotomy (PPC). Patients and Methods: Sixty-seven subjects were randomly assigned to undergo lens cataract removal with the capsulotomy step performed using either CCC or PPC. Specular microscopy images were obtained pre-operatively, 1 month and 3 months after surgery. ECD, %Hex and CV were analyzed in a masked fashion by an independent reading center. Results: The mean percentage ECD loss at 1 month was 11.5% in the CCC group and 12.3% in the PPC group (P = 0.818; Conclusion: No differences in ECD loss, %Hex and CV were observed between patients who received CCC or PPC. PPC use during cataract surgery does not result in any increased endothelial cell loss beyond that normally associated with this surgery.

Indexed as

automated capsulotomycorneal endotheliumzepto

Identifiers

PMID37346471
PMCPMC10281278
OpenAlexW4380882747

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.