Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37346420›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2023

Evaluation of multidimensional pediatric-psychosomatic inpatient therapy: a pilot study comparing two treatment modalities.

Tim Botschek, Maximilian Monninger, Dennis Schäfer, Rabia Cevik, Kübra Memis, Ulrike Müller, Martina Monninger, Burkhard Brosig

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 37% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Tim BotschekFamily Psychosomatics, Department of Pediatrics and Neonatology, Justus-Liebig-University Giessen, Giessen, Germany.
Maximilian MonningerDepartment of General Pediatrics, University Children's Hospital Muenster, Münster, Germany.
Dennis SchäferSigmund-Freud-Institut, Frankfurt, Germany.
Rabia CevikDepartment of General Pediatrics, University Children's Hospital Muenster, Münster, Germany.
Kübra MemisFamily Psychosomatics, Department of Pediatrics and Neonatology, Justus-Liebig-University Giessen, Giessen, Germany.
Ulrike MüllerFamily Psychosomatics, Department of Pediatrics and Neonatology, Justus-Liebig-University Giessen, Giessen, Germany.
Martina MonningerDepartment of General Pediatrics, University Children's Hospital Muenster, Münster, Germany.
Burkhard BrosigFamily Psychosomatics, Department of Pediatrics and Neonatology, Justus-Liebig-University Giessen, Giessen, Germany.
University of Giessen · DEUniversity Hospital Münster · DESigmund Freud Institut · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Multidimensional pediatric-psychosomatic inpatient treatment should be considered a highly relevant concept in the German healthcare system. This treatment concept has been successfully integrated to support youth with mental disorders and patients with chronic somatic conditions. Studies on treatment impact and empirical evidence of pediatric-psychosomatic inpatient therapies are rare, despite their clinical significance. Therefore, the study aims to provide initial indications of what constitutes to enhanced treatment effectiveness by comparing two different pediatric-psychosomatic inpatient treatment concepts. The clinics are comparable regarding the treated disorders, which include: dissociative, mood, and somatoform disorders, and psychological factors associated with chronic somatic conditions. Multidimensional treatment in both clinics include components of individual and family therapy, along with group-, art-, music-, creative-, and physio-therapy. Both clinics differed regarding their treatment philosophy in which; Clinic A practiced psychodynamic behavioral elements more strongly, while Clinic B rooted itself more strongly with psychoanalysis and family-dynamic practices. Method: Each clinic recruited 25 patients for the study. They completed two questionnaires both at admission and discharge, which measured general behavioral and emotional problems (YSR); and, respectively, difficulties in emotion perception and processing (TAS-26). The effectiveness of the treatment was examined by conducting one-sample Results: In both settings, treatment effects can be observed regarding internalizing problems. For alexithymia, no effects were seen in Clinic B, while in Clinic A, there was a significant reduction. When comparing both clinics, the ANOVAs showed significant interaction effects displaying advantages for Clinic A in the reduction of internalizing, total behavioral problems and alexithymia. Taking into account the treatment duration as a covariate, those effects level out. Significant differences between the clinics were no longer statistically detectable. Discussion: The present study provides substantial preliminary indications on the effectiveness of multidimensional pediatric-psychosomatic inpatient therapy, which seems suitable for alleviating the general symptom burden and problems by identifying and processing emotions. Furthermore, the results indicate that an extended treatment duration may contribute to more pronounced effects.

Indexed as

alexithymiafamily therapymultidimensional inpatient therapypediatric psychosomaticspilot studytreatment duration

Identifiers

PMID37346420
PMCPMC10279886
OpenAlexW4379520156

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.