ArticlePeerJ. Computer science2022
Comprehension of polarity of articles by citation sentiment analysis using TF-IDF and ML classifiers.
Article in PeerJ. Computer science, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Prediction Model of Ocular Metastases in Gastric Adenocarcinoma: Machine Learning-Based Development and Interpretation Study.Technology in cancer research & treatmentArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Sentiment analysis has been researched extensively during the last few years, however, the sentiment analysis of citations in a research article is an unexplored research area. Sentiment analysis of citations can provide new applications in bibliometrics and provide insights for a better understanding of scientific knowledge. Citation count, as it is used today to measure the quality of a paper, does not portray the quality of a scientific article, as the article may be cited to indicate its weakness. So determining the polarity of a citation is an important task to quantify the quality of the cited article and ascertain its impact and ranking. This article presents an approach to determine the polarity of the cited article using term frequency-inverse document frequency and machine learning classifiers. To analyze the influence of an imbalanced dataset, several experiments are performed with and without the synthetic minority oversampling technique (SMOTE) and uni-gram and bi-gram term frequency-inverse document frequency (TF-IDF). Results indicate that the proposed methodology achieves high accuracy of 99.0% with the extra tree classifier when trained on SMOTE oversampled dataset and bi-gram features.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.