Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37346305›Full record

ArticlePeerJ. Computer science2022

Self voting classification model for online meeting app review sentiment analysis and topic modeling.

Naila Aslam, Kewen Xia, Furqan Rustam, Ernesto Lee, Imran Ashraf

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PeerJ. Computer science, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Naila AslamSchool of Electronics and Information Engineering, Hebei University of Technology, Tianjin, China.
Kewen XiaSchool of Electronics and Information Engineering, Hebei University of Technology, Tianjin, China.
Furqan RustamSchool of Computer Science University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.
Ernesto LeeCollege of Engineering and Technology Miami Dade College, Miami, FL, USA.
Imran AshrafInformation and Communication Engineering, Yeungnam University, Gyeongsan-si, Republic of Korea.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Online meeting applications (apps) have emerged as a potential solution for conferencing, education and meetings, etc. during the COVID-19 outbreak and are used by private companies and governments alike. A large number of such apps compete with each other by providing a different set of functions towards users' satisfaction. These apps take users' feedback in the form of opinions and reviews which are later used to improve the quality of services. Sentiment analysis serves as the key function to obtain and analyze users' sentiments from the posted feedback indicating the importance of efficient and accurate sentiment analysis. This study proposes the novel idea of self voting classification (SVC) where multiple variants of the same model are trained using different feature extraction approaches and the final prediction is based on the ensemble of these variants. For experiments, the data collected from the Google Play store for online meeting apps were used. Primarily, the focus of this study is to use a support vector machine (SVM) with the proposed SVC approach using both soft voting (SV) and hard voting (HV) criteria, however, decision tree, logistic regression, and k nearest neighbor have also been investigated for performance appraisal. Three variants of models are trained on a bag of words, term frequency-inverse document frequency, and hashing features to make the ensemble. Experimental results indicate that the proposed SVC approach can elevate the performance of traditional machine learning models substantially. The SVM obtains 1.00 and 0.98 accuracy scores, using HV and SV criteria, respectively when used with the proposed SVC approach. Topic-wise sentiment analysis using the latent Dirichlet allocation technique is performed as well for topic modeling.

Indexed as

Apps reviewsMachine learningOnline meeting applicationsSelf voting criteriaSentiment analysis features

Identifiers

PMID37346305
PMCPMC10280218

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.