Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37346293›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in pharmacology2023

Neopeltolide and its synthetic derivatives: a promising new class of anticancer agents.

Sheila I Peña-Corona, Héctor Hernández-Parra, Sergio A Bernal-Chávez, Néstor Mendoza-Muñoz, Alejandra Romero-Montero, María Luisa Del Prado-Audelo, Hernán Cortés, Dilek Arslan Ateşşahin, Solomon Habtemariam, Zainab M Almarhoon and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Complex II ambiguities-FADHThe Journal of biological chemistry · 2024
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 10 institutions in 7 countries.

Sheila I Peña-CoronaDepartamento de Farmacia, Facultad de Química, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Ciudad de México, Mexico.
Héctor Hernández-ParraDepartamento de Farmacología, Centro de Investigación y de Estudios Avanzados del Instituto Politécnico Nacional, Ciudad de México, Mexico.
Sergio A Bernal-ChávezDepartamento de Farmacia, Facultad de Química, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Ciudad de México, Mexico.
Néstor Mendoza-MuñozFacultad de Ciencias Químicas, Universidad de Colima, Coquimatlán, Mexico.
Alejandra Romero-MonteroDepartamento de Farmacia, Facultad de Química, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Ciudad de México, Mexico.
María Luisa Del Prado-AudeloEscuela de Ingeniería y Ciencias, Tecnologico de Monterrey, Monterrey, Mexico.
Hernán CortésLaboratorio de Medicina Genómica, Departamento de Genómica, Instituto Nacional de Rehabilitación Luis Guillermo Ibarra Ibarra, Ciudad de México, Mexico.
Dilek Arslan AteşşahinDepartment of Plant and Animal Production, Baskil Vocational School, Fırat University, Elazıg, Türkiye.
Solomon HabtemariamPharmacognosy Research and Herbal Analysis Services UK, University of Greenwich, London, Kent, United Kingdom.
Zainab M AlmarhoonDepartment of Chemistry, College of Science, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Ahmad Faizal Abdull RazisDepartment of Food Science, Faculty of Food Science and Technology, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Selangor, Malaysia.
Babagana ModuNatural Medicines and Products Research Laboratory, Institute of Bioscience, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Selangor, Malaysia.
Javad Sharifi-RadFacultad de Medicina, Universidad del Azuay, Cuenca, Ecuador.
Gerardo Leyva-GómezDepartamento de Farmacia, Facultad de Química, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Ciudad de México, Mexico.
Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México · MXUniversiti Putra Malaysia · MYFırat University · TRInstituto Nacional de Rehabilitación · MXInstituto Politécnico Nacional · MXKing Saud University · SATecnológico de Monterrey · MXUniversidad de Colima · MXUniversidad del Azuay · ECUniversity of Greenwich · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Being the first or second cause of death worldwide, cancer represents the most significant clinical, social, and financial burden of any human illness. Despite recent progresses in cancer diagnosis and management, traditional cancer chemotherapies have shown several adverse side effects and loss of potency due to increased resistance. As a result, one of the current approaches is on with the search of bioactive anticancer compounds from natural sources. Neopeltolide is a marine-derived macrolide isolated from deep-water sponges collected off Jamaica's north coast. Its mechanism of action is still under research but represents a potentially promising novel drug for cancer therapy. In this review, we first illustrate the general structural characterization of neopeltolide, the semi-synthetic derivatives, and current medical applications. In addition, we reviewed its anticancer properties, primarily based on

Indexed as

cancercytotoxicmarine-derived macrolidenatural antiproliferative drugsneopeltolide

Identifiers

PMID37346293
PMCPMC10280003
OpenAlexW4379514510

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.