Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37346246›Full record

ArticleHuman reproduction open2023

Cancer risk in children, adolescents, and young adults conceived by ART in 1983-2011.

Mandy Spaan, Martina Pontesilli, Alexandra W van den Belt-Dusebout, Curt W Burger, Marry M van den Heuvel-Eibrink, Anita C J Ravelli, Mariëtte Goddijn, Cornelis B Lambalk, Tessa J Roseboom, Flora E van Leeuwen and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Human reproduction open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Return of Research Results to Participants in Longitudinal Cohort Studies in Health Research: Findings From 24 Cohorts of the Amsterdam Cohort Hub.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Mandy SpaanDepartment of Epidemiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3872-005X
Martina PontesilliDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Alexandra W van den Belt-DuseboutDepartment of Epidemiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Curt W BurgerDepartment of Gynecologic Oncology, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Marry M van den Heuvel-EibrinkPrincess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Anita C J RavelliDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Mariëtte GoddijnCentre for Reproductive Medicine, Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9928-9673
Cornelis B LambalkAmsterdam Reproduction and Development, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3947-5129
Tessa J RoseboomDepartment of Epidemiology and Data Science, Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Flora E van LeeuwenDepartment of Epidemiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5871-1484
OMEGA-offspring steering Group
Amsterdam University Medical Centers · NLThe Netherlands Cancer Institute · NLErasmus MC · NLPrincess Máxima Center · NL

Funding

Long-term Impact of Fertility Treatment StudyR01HD088393 · NICHD · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI HERNAN, MIGUEL, HERNANDEZ-DIAZ, SONIA · 2017 to 2022
$2.9M
NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD088393
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

study questionDo children, adolescents, and young adults born after ART, including IVF, ICSI and frozen-thawed embryo transfer (FET), have an increased risk of cancer compared with children born to subfertile couples not conceived by ART and children from the general population? SUMMARY ANSWER: After a median follow-up of 18 years, the overall cancer risk was not increased in children conceived by ART, but a slight risk increase was observed in children conceived after ICSI. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: There is growing evidence that ART procedures could perturb epigenetic processes during the pre-implantation period and influence long-term health. Recent studies showed (non-)significantly increased cancer risks after ICSI and FET, but not after IVF. STUDY DESIGN SIZE DURATION: A nationwide historical cohort study with prospective follow-up was carried out, including all live-born offspring from women treated with ART between 1983 and 2011 and subfertile women not treated with ART in one of the 13 Dutch IVF clinics and two fertility centers. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS SETTING

methodsChildren were identified through the mothers' records in the Personal Records Database. Information on the conception method of each child was collected through the mother's medical record. In total, the cohort comprises 89 249 live-born children of subfertile couples, of whom 51 417 were conceived using ART and 37 832 were not (i.e. conceived naturally, through ovulation induction, or after IUI). Cancer incidence was ascertained through linkage with the Netherlands Cancer Registry for the period 1989-2019. Cancer risk in children conceived using ART was compared with risk in children born to subfertile couples but not conceived by ART (hazard ratio (HR)) and children from the general population (standardized incidence ratios (SIRs)). MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: In total, 358 cancers were observed after a median follow-up of 18 years. Overall cancer risk was not increased in children conceived using ART, when compared with the general population (SIR = 0.96, 95% CI = 0.81-1.12) or with children from subfertile couples not conceived by ART (HR = 1.06, 95% CI = 0.84-1.33). Compared with children from subfertile couples not conceived by ART, the use of IVF or FET was not associated with increased cancer risk, but ICSI was associated with a slight risk increase (HR = 1.58, 95% CI = 1.08-2.31). Risk of cancer after ART did not increase at older ages (≥18 years, HR = 1.26, 95% CI = 0.88-1.81) compared to cancer risk in children not conceived by ART. LIMITATIONS REASONS FOR CAUTION: The observed increased risk among children conceived using ICSI must be interpreted with caution owing to the small number of cases. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE

findingsAfter a median follow-up of 18 years, children conceived using ART do not have an increased overall cancer risk. Many large studies with prolonged follow-up are needed to investigate cancer risk in (young) adults conceived by different types of ART. In addition, international pooling of studies is recommended to provide sufficient power to study risk of specific cancer sites after ART. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTERESTS: This work was supported by The Dutch Cancer Society (NKI 2006-3631) that funded the OMEGA-women's cohort, Children Cancer Free (KIKA; 147) that funded the OMEGA-I-II offspring cohort. The OMEGA-III offspring cohort was supported by a Postdoc Stipend of Amsterdam Reproduction & Development, and the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health & Human Development of the National Institutes of Health under Award Number R01HD088393. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health. The authors declare no competing interests. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: N/A.

Indexed as

adolescentcancerchildhoodcohortfertility treatmentsfollow-upfrozen embryo transferICSIinfertilityIVF

Identifiers

PMID37346246
PMCPMC10279651
OpenAlexW4379276076

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.