ArticleCureus2023
Fiberoptic Intubation vs. Video-Assisted Fiberoptic Intubation in a High-Fidelity Pediatric Simulator: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
Article in Cureus, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- High Fidelity Simulations to Improve Pediatric Airway Management: A Narrative Review.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Multidisciplinary Management of Acute Tetraparesis in an Infant with Achondroplasia, with a Focus on Anesthetic Strategies: A Case Report.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionLife-threatening hypoxemia during tracheal intubation is more likely to occur in children than adults due to its unique physiological and anatomical nature. Fiberoptic intubation is widely performed in children with difficult airways. However, mastery of fiberoptic intubation requires substantial training, and novice trainees need to attempt fiberoptic intubation in children at high risk of respiratory-related adverse events. Therefore, a safer method than traditional fiberoptic intubation for children with difficult airways is desirable for novice anesthesia trainees. This study aimed to compare the efficacy of video-assisted fiberoptic intubation (VAFI) with that of traditional fiberoptic intubation (FOI) in a high-fidelity pediatric simulator by medical professionals with no experience in tracheal intubation.
methodThis randomized, controlled, simulation-based study was conducted in a tertiary-care pediatric hospital. Registered nurses working in the operating room were enrolled in this study and randomly assigned to either the FOI or VAFI groups. Participants in the FOI group performed fiberoptic intubation without the aid of any device, whereas those in the VAFI group used a video laryngoscope to obtain a better glottic view. The primary outcome was the time from the moment the tip of the flexible bronchoscope passed between the upper and lower incisors until the completion of tracheal intubation.
resultsA total of 28 participants were enrolled in this study. There was no significant difference in the time until the completion of tracheal intubation between FOI and VAFI, with a median time of 55.0 seconds for FOI and 42.5 seconds for VAFI (P = 0.22). Secondary outcomes, including time until passing the vocal cord, the number of intubation attempts, and the first success rate, did not also illustrate the significant difference between the groups.
conclusionThis study did not demonstrate the superiority of VAFI over conventional FOI in a high-fidelity pediatric simulator by medical providers with no experience in tracheal intubation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.