Article3D printing and additive manufacturing2023
Anomaly Detection in Fused Filament Fabrication Using Machine Learning.
Article in 3D printing and additive manufacturing, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 72 citations in OpenAlex.
- Learning Moisture-Induced Damage From Vision: Diffusion Models for Real-Time Monitoring of Additive Manufacturing Processes.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026Article
- Leveraging Machine Learning for Porosity Prediction in AM Using FDM for Pretrained Models and Process Development.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Deep Learning-Based Super Resolution Applied to Finite Element Analysis of Fused Deposition Modeling 3D Printing.3D printing and additive manufacturing · 2025Article
- Current State of the Art and Potential for Construction and Demolition Waste Processing: A Scoping Review of Sensor-Based Quality Monitoring and Control for In- and Online Implementation in Production Processes.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Machine learning-assisted stiffness prediction in high-cell-density bioprinting.Bio-design and manufacturing · 2025Article
- Review
- Review
- Intelligent Optimization Method of Piezoelectric Ejection System Design Based on Finite Element Simulation and Neural Network.3D printing and additive manufacturing · 2024Article
- Automated Service Height Fault Detection Using Computer Vision and Machine Learning for Badminton Matches.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Fused filament fabrication (FFF) has been widely used in various industries, and the adoption of technology is growing significantly. However, the FFF process has several disadvantages like inconsistent part quality and print repeatability. The occurrence of manufacturing-induced defects often leads to these shortcomings. This study aims to develop and implement an on-site monitoring system, which consists of a camera attached to the print head and the laptop that processes the video feed, for the extrusion-based 3D printers incorporating computer vision and object detection models to detect defects and make corrections in real-time. Image data from two classes of defects were collected to train the model. Various YOLO architectures were evaluated to study the ability to detect and classify printing anomalies such as under-extrusion and over-extrusion. Four of the trained models, YOLOv3 and YOLOv4 with "Tiny" variation, achieved a mean average precision score of >80% using the AP50 metric. Subsequently, two of the models (YOLOv3-Tiny 100 and 300 epochs) were optimized using Open Neural Network Exchange (ONNX) model conversion and ONNX Runtime to improve the inference speed. A classification accuracy rate of 89.8% and an inference speed of 70 frames per second were obtained. Before implementing the on-site monitoring system, a correction algorithm was developed to perform simple corrective actions based on defect classification. The G-codes of the corrective actions were sent to the printers during the printing process. This implementation successfully demonstrated real-time monitoring and autonomous correction during the FFF 3D printing process. This implementation will pave the way for an on-site monitoring and correction system through closed-loop feedback from other additive manufacturing (AM) processes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.