Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37346070›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in oncology2023

Role of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma risk factors in intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm progression.

Manuel Gentiluomo, Chiara Corradi, Paolo Giorgio Arcidiacono, Stefano Crippa, Massimo Falconi, Giulio Belfiori, Riccardo Farinella, Laura Apadula, Gaetano Lauri, Niccolò Bina and 5 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
5.1field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. DNA Damage and Repair in Pancreatic Cancer-The Latest Findings.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Pancreatic Cancer: A Review of Risk Factors.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Manuel GentiluomoDepartment of Biology, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.
Chiara CorradiDepartment of Biology, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.
Paolo Giorgio ArcidiaconoPancreato-Biliary Endoscopy and Endosonography Division, Pancreas Translational and Clinical Research Center, Istituti di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS) San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.
Stefano CrippaUnit of Pancreatic Surgery, Pancreas Translational and Clinical Research Center, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Vita-Salute University, Milan, Italy.
Massimo FalconiUnit of Pancreatic Surgery, Pancreas Translational and Clinical Research Center, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Vita-Salute University, Milan, Italy.
Giulio BelfioriUnit of Pancreatic Surgery, Pancreas Translational and Clinical Research Center, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Vita-Salute University, Milan, Italy.
Riccardo FarinellaDepartment of Biology, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.
Laura ApadulaPancreato-Biliary Endoscopy and Endosonography Division, Pancreas Translational and Clinical Research Center, Istituti di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS) San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.
Gaetano LauriPancreato-Biliary Endoscopy and Endosonography Division, Pancreas Translational and Clinical Research Center, Istituti di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS) San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.
Niccolò BinaPancreato-Biliary Endoscopy and Endosonography Division, Pancreas Translational and Clinical Research Center, Istituti di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS) San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.
Cosmeri RizzatoDepartment of Translational Research and of New Technologies in Medicine and Surgery, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.
Federico CanzianGenomic Epidemiology Group, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.
Luca MorelliGeneral Surgery Unit, Department of Translational Research and New Technologies in Medicine and Surgery, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.
Gabriele CapursoPancreato-Biliary Endoscopy and Endosonography Division, Pancreas Translational and Clinical Research Center, Istituti di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS) San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.
Daniele CampaDepartment of Biology, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.
University of Pisa · ITIstituti di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico · ITVita-Salute San Raffaele University · ITHeidelberg University · DESapienza University of Rome · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is lethal due to its late diagnosis and lack of successful treatments. A possible strategy to reduce its death burden is prevention. Intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (IPMNs) are precursors of PDAC. It is difficult to estimate the incidence of IPMNs because they are asymptomatic. Two recent studies reported pancreatic cysts in 3% and 13% of scanned subjects. The possibility of identifying a subgroup of IPMN patients with a higher probability of progression into cancer could be instrumental in increasing the survival rate. In this study, genetic and non-genetic PDAC risk factors were tested in a group of IPMN patients under surveillance. Methods: A retrospective study was conducted on 354 IPMN patients enrolled in two Italian centres with an average follow-up of 64 months. With the use of DNA extracted from blood, collected at IPMN diagnosis, all patients were genotyped for 30 known PDAC risk loci. The polymorphisms were analysed individually and grouped in an unweighted polygenic score (PGS) in relation to IPMN progression. The ABO blood group and non-genetic PDAC risk factors were also analysed. IPMN progression was defined based on the development of worrisome features and/or high-risk stigmata during follow-up. Results: Two genetic variants (rs1517037 and rs10094872) showed suggestive associations with an increment of IPMN progression. After correction for multiple testing, using the Bonferroni correction, none of the variants showed a statistically significant association. However, associations were observed for the non-genetic variables, such as smoking status, comparing heavy smokers with light smokers (HR = 3.81, 95% 1.43-10.09, Conclusion: In conclusion, this study is the first attempt to investigate the presence of shared genetic background between PDAC risk and IPMN progression; however, the results suggest that the 30 established PDAC susceptibility polymorphisms are not associated with clinical IPMN progression in a sample of 354 patients. However, we observed indications of cigarette smoking and body mass index (BMI) involvement in IPMN progression. The biological mechanism that could link these two risk factors to progression could be chronic inflammation, of which both smoking and obesity are strong promoters.

Indexed as

association studyintraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (IPMN)pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PADC)polygenic score (PGS)single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP)

Identifiers

PMID37346070
PMCPMC10280811
OpenAlexW4379536353

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.