ArticleFrontiers in oncology2023
A novel framework of multiclass skin lesion recognition from dermoscopic images using deep learning and explainable AI.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- ChatGPT, Gemini, and Claude in clinical and dermoscopic image analysis of basal cell carcinoma and its common mimickers: A comparative performance analysis.JID innovations : skin science from molecules to population health · 2026Article
- DermaScanAI an explainable hybrid deep learning framework for automated skin lesion classification using dual attention and metadata fusion.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- DermaCalibra: A Robust and Explainable Multimodal Framework for Skin Lesion Diagnosis via Bayesian Uncertainty and Dynamic Modulation.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- SkinDet-YOLO: a context- and boundary-aware yolov8-based framework for skin disease detection.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- Article
- Human-centered AI as a framework guiding the development of image-based diagnostic tools in oncology: a systematic review.ESMO real world data and digital oncology · 2024Review
- Enhancing Skin Cancer Diagnosis Using Swin Transformer with Hybrid Shifted Window-Based Multi-head Self-attention and SwiGLU-Based MLP.Journal of imaging informatics in medicine · 2024Article
- Skin Cancer Detection and Classification Using Neural Network Algorithms: A Systematic Review.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- A Multi-level ensemble approach for skin lesion classification using Customized Transfer Learning with Triple Attention.PloS one · 2024Article
- Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Skin cancer is a serious disease that affects people all over the world. Melanoma is an aggressive form of skin cancer, and early detection can significantly reduce human mortality. In the United States, approximately 97,610 new cases of melanoma will be diagnosed in 2023. However, challenges such as lesion irregularities, low-contrast lesions, intraclass color similarity, redundant features, and imbalanced datasets make improved recognition accuracy using computerized techniques extremely difficult. This work presented a new framework for skin lesion recognition using data augmentation, deep learning, and explainable artificial intelligence. In the proposed framework, data augmentation is performed at the initial step to increase the dataset size, and then two pretrained deep learning models are employed. Both models have been fine-tuned and trained using deep transfer learning. Both models (Xception and ShuffleNet) utilize the global average pooling layer for deep feature extraction. The analysis of this step shows that some important information is missing; therefore, we performed the fusion. After the fusion process, the computational time was increased; therefore, we developed an improved Butterfly Optimization Algorithm. Using this algorithm, only the best features are selected and classified using machine learning classifiers. In addition, a GradCAM-based visualization is performed to analyze the important region in the image. Two publicly available datasets-ISIC2018 and HAM10000-have been utilized and obtained improved accuracy of 99.3% and 91.5%, respectively. Comparing the proposed framework accuracy with state-of-the-art methods reveals improved and less computational time.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.