Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37345725›Full record

ReviewMagnetic resonance in medicine2023

Low-field MRI: A report on the 2022 ISMRM workshop.

Adrienne E Campbell-Washburn, Kathryn E Keenan, Peng Hu, John P Mugler, Krishna S Nayak, Andrew G Webb, Johnes Obungoloch, Kevin N Sheth, Jürgen Hennig, Matthew S Rosen and 5 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Magnetic resonance in medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. MRI and Implant Safety at Low-Field and Ultralow-Field Strengths.Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI · 2026
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Adrienne E Campbell-WashburnCardiovascular Branch, Division of Intramural Research, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7169-5693
Kathryn E KeenanPhysical Measurement Laboratory, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Boulder, Colorado, USA.
Peng HuSchool of Biomedical Engineering, ShanghaiTech University, Shanghai, China.
John P MuglerDepartment of Radiology & Medical Imaging, Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA.
Krishna S NayakMing Hsieh Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Viterbi School of Engineering, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5735-3550
Andrew G WebbDepartment of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-4045-9732
Johnes ObungolochMbarara University of Science and Technology, Mbarara, Uganda.
Kevin N ShethDivision of Neurocritical Care and Emergency Neurology, Departments of Neurology and Neurosurgery, and the Yale Center for Brain and Mind Health, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.
Jürgen HennigDept.of Radiology, Medical Physics, University Medical Center Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-2273-3497
Matthew S RosenMassachusetts General Hospital, A. A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7194-002X
Najat SalamehCenter for Adaptable MRI Technology (AMT Center), Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Basel, Allschwil, Switzerland.
Daniel K SodicksonDepartment of Radiology, NYU Langone Health, New York, New York, USA.
Joel M SteinDepartment of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
José P MarquesDonders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Radboud University Nijmegen, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Orlando P SimonettiDivision of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8994-0095

Funding

Yale Clinical and Translational Science Award (U Component)UL1TR001863 · NCATS · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI John H. Krystal, LUCILA OHNO-MACHADO · 2016 to 2026
$102.9M
Development of high-performance low field MRI technology ZIAHL006257 · NHLBI · NATIONAL HEART, LUNG, AND BLOOD INSTITUTE · PI CAMPBELL-WASHBURN, ADRIENNE · 2021 to 2025
$8.1M
Development and validation of cardiovascular MRI techniques on a low-field, ultra-wide bore system to assess patients with severe obesityR01HL161618 · NHLBI · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI Orlando Paul Simonetti · 2022 to 2026
$2.9M
Intramural NIH HHS Z99 HL999999NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001863NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL161618
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In March 2022, the first ISMRM Workshop on Low-Field MRI was held virtually. The goals of this workshop were to discuss recent low field MRI technology including hardware and software developments, novel methodology, new contrast mechanisms, as well as the clinical translation and dissemination of these systems. The virtual Workshop was attended by 368 registrants from 24 countries, and included 34 invited talks, 100 abstract presentations, 2 panel discussions, and 2 live scanner demonstrations. Here, we report on the scientific content of the Workshop and identify the key themes that emerged. The subject matter of the Workshop reflected the ongoing developments of low-field MRI as an accessible imaging modality that may expand the usage of MRI through cost reduction, portability, and ease of installation. Many talks in this Workshop addressed the use of computational power, efficient acquisitions, and contemporary hardware to overcome the SNR limitations associated with low field strength. Participants discussed the selection of appropriate clinical applications that leverage the unique capabilities of low-field MRI within traditional radiology practices, other point-of-care settings, and the broader community. The notion of "image quality" versus "information content" was also discussed, as images from low-field portable systems that are purpose-built for clinical decision-making may not replicate the current standard of clinical imaging. Speakers also described technical challenges and infrastructure challenges related to portability and widespread dissemination, and speculated about future directions for the field to improve the technology and establish clinical value.

Indexed as

Magnetic Resonance ImagingRadiologyHumansSoftwareaccessibilityimage acquisitionimage reconstructionlow-field MRIMRI hardwarepoint-of-care MRIportable MRI

Identifiers

PMID37345725
PMCPMC10683532

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.