Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37345653›Full record

ReviewBiochemical Society transactions2023

Recent advances in membrane mimetics for membrane protein research.

John William Young

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biochemical Society transactions, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Advances in native cell membrane nanoparticles system.Current opinion in structural biology · 2025
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Comparison of lipid dynamics and permeability in styrene-maleic acid and diisobutylene-maleic acid copolymer lipid nanodiscs by electron paramagnetic resonance spectroscopy.Journal of biological inorganic chemistry : JBIC : a publication of the Society of Biological Inorganic Chemistry · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Nanodiscs for the study of membrane proteins.Current opinion in structural biology · 2024
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

John William YoungDepartment of Chemistry, Kavli Institute for Nanoscience Discovery, Dorothy Crowfoot Hodgkin Building, University of Oxford, South Parks Rd, Oxford OX1 3QU, U.K.ORCID 0000-0003-3541-509X

Funding

CIHR MFE-181888
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Membrane proteins are a highly relevant class of biological molecules and comprise ∼60% of current drug targets. Before being analyzed by structural, biochemical, and biophysical methods, membrane proteins must first be extracted from cellular membranes - often using detergents. Detergent-extracted membrane proteins are amenable to analysis by structural, biochemical, and biophysical techniques. In certain cases, however, detergents can disturb native protein conformations and/or biological activity. This has led to the development of membrane mimetics, which stabilize membrane proteins in a native membrane-like environment that is water-soluble and detergent-free. This review provides an overview of recent developments in the membrane mimetic field, with a focus on nanodiscs, Saposin lipid nanoparticles (SapNPs), peptidiscs, and SMA lipid particles (SMALPs) - and highlights their utility for supporting biophysical, biochemical, and structural characterization of membrane proteins and complexes.

Indexed as

BiomimeticsMembrane ProteinsCell MembraneDetergentsLipid BilayersDetergentsLipid BilayersMembrane Proteinsmembrane mimeticsmembrane protein reconstitutionmembrane proteinsnanodiscspeptidiscs

Identifiers

PMID37345653
PMCPMC10317169

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.