Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37345561›Full record

Trial reportClinical and translational science2023

A phase I randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled study assessing the safety and pharmacokinetics of RIPK1 inhibitor GFH312 in healthy subjects.

Jason Lickliter, Shuang Wang, Wenxin Zhang, Huaqiang Zhu, Jing Wang, Congqiao Zhao, Haige Shen, Yu Wang

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled TrialClinical Trial, Phase I
In one paragraph

Trial report in Clinical and translational science, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Mechanisms, regulation and clinical relevance of necroptosis.Nature reviews. Molecular cell biology · 2026
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. RIPK1: A Promising Target for Intervention Neuroinflammation.Journal of neuroimmune pharmacology : the official journal of the Society on NeuroImmune Pharmacology · 2025
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Acute lung injury: a view from the perspective of necroptosis.Inflammation research : official journal of the European Histamine Research Society ... [et al.] · 2024
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Jason LickliterNucleus Network, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Shuang WangGenfleet Therapeutics, Shanghai, China.
Wenxin ZhangGenfleet Therapeutics, Shanghai, China.
Huaqiang ZhuGenfleet Therapeutics, Shanghai, China.
Jing WangGenfleet Therapeutics, Shanghai, China.
Congqiao ZhaoGenfleet Therapeutics, Shanghai, China.
Haige ShenGenfleet Therapeutics, Shanghai, China.
Yu WangGenfleet Therapeutics, Shanghai, China.
Shanghai Genon Biological Products (China) · CNBreast Cancer Network Australia · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Receptor-interacting protein kinase 1 (RIPK1) mediates necroptosis and inflammation in various pathophysiologies, emerging as a pharmacological target for neurodegenerative and inflammatory indications. This phase I, first-in-human, placebo-controlled study evaluated the safety, pharmacokinetics (PKs), and pharmacodynamics (PDs) of GFH312, an RIPK1 inhibitor, in healthy adults. Subjects received GFH312 as a single ascending dose up to 500 mg (part I) or once-daily repeated doses up to 200 mg for 14 days (part II). PKs were assessed using plasma and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF); PDs were assessed by phospho-RIPK1 levels. Seventy-six subjects were enrolled between April 2021 and June 2022: 38 (part I) and 19 (part II) received GFH312; 14 and five received placebo, respectively. At least one treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) occurred in 42.1% (part I) and 63.2% (part II) of subjects receiving GFH312, compared with 42.9% and 40.0% of subjects receiving placebo, respectively. The most common TEAE was headache (21.1%). Two treatment-related TEAEs were reported in part I and four in part II. No serious TEAEs were reported. Systemic absorption was rapid; exposure (area under the concentration-time curve from time zero to the last measurable concentration and maximum plasma concentration) increased with dose level. The GFH312 CSF concentration post 100 mg single dose was approximately fourfold higher than the half maximal inhibitory concentration of human monocyte-derived macrophages necroptosis with expected central nervous system penetration. Subjects receiving GFH312 had decreased phospho-RIPK1 levels in peripheral blood mononuclear cells postdose. In conclusion, GFH312 was well-tolerated and demonstrated RIPK1 inhibition in healthy subjects. Ongoing studies will inform the use of GFH312 in potential indications.

Indexed as

Leukocytes, MononuclearReceptor-Interacting Protein Serine-Threonine KinasesAdultArea Under CurveDose-Response Relationship, DrugDouble-Blind MethodHealthy VolunteersHumansReceptor-Interacting Protein Serine-Threonine KinasesRIPK1 protein, human

Identifiers

PMID37345561
PMCPMC10499419
OpenAlexW4381597740

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.