Trial reportClinical and translational science2023
A phase I randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled study assessing the safety and pharmacokinetics of RIPK1 inhibitor GFH312 in healthy subjects.
Trial report in Clinical and translational science, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.
- A Randomized Phase I Trial Evaluating Safety and Pharmacokinetics of Single and Multiple Ascending Doses of Eclitasertib, a RIPK1 Inhibitor, in Healthy Participants.Advances in therapy · 2025Trial
- A phase I randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled study assessing the safety and pharmacokinetics of RIPK1 inhibitor GFH312 in healthy subjects.Clinical and translational science · 2023Trial
- Mechanisms, regulation and clinical relevance of necroptosis.Nature reviews. Molecular cell biology · 2026Review
- Cell Death in Neurodegenerative Diseases: Molecular Mechanisms and Therapeutic Targets.MedComm · 2026Review
- RIPK 1 in Alzheimer's Disease: Research Progress Integrating Pathogenesis on Necroptosis-Related Neuroinflammation, and Potential Therapeutic Strategies.Biomedicines · 2026Review
- Review on the Mechanism of and Therapies Targeting PANoptosis in Ulcerative Colitis.Biomolecules · 2026Review
- Receptor-Interacting Protein Kinase 1 (RIPK1): A Potential Therapeutic Target in Ischemic Stroke.Molecular neurobiology · 2026Review
- RIPK1 autophosphorylation at S161 mediates cell death and inflammation.The Journal of experimental medicine · 2025Article
- Review
- Comprehensive Review of Mechanisms and Translational Perspectives on Programmed Cell Death in Vascular Calcification.Biomolecules · 2025Review
- Allosteric targeting of RIPK1: discovery of novel inhibitorsRSC medicinal chemistry · 2025Article
- RIPK1: A Promising Target for Intervention Neuroinflammation.Journal of neuroimmune pharmacology : the official journal of the Society on NeuroImmune Pharmacology · 2025Review
- Necroptosis in vascular cognitive impairment: mechanisms and therapeutic potential.Frontiers in aging neuroscience · 2025Review
- RIPK1 signaling pathways: implications for autoimmune and neuroinflammatory diseases.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Review
- Regulation of RIPK1 Phosphorylation: Implications for Inflammation, Cell Death, and Therapeutic Interventions.Biomedicines · 2024Review
- Acute lung injury: a view from the perspective of necroptosis.Inflammation research : official journal of the European Histamine Research Society ... [et al.] · 2024Review
- Virtual screening of flavonoids as potential RIPK1 inhibitors for neurodegeneration therapy.PeerJ · 2024Article
- Mechanisms of PANoptosis and relevant small-molecule compounds for fighting diseases.Cell death & disease · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Receptor-interacting protein kinase 1 (RIPK1) mediates necroptosis and inflammation in various pathophysiologies, emerging as a pharmacological target for neurodegenerative and inflammatory indications. This phase I, first-in-human, placebo-controlled study evaluated the safety, pharmacokinetics (PKs), and pharmacodynamics (PDs) of GFH312, an RIPK1 inhibitor, in healthy adults. Subjects received GFH312 as a single ascending dose up to 500 mg (part I) or once-daily repeated doses up to 200 mg for 14 days (part II). PKs were assessed using plasma and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF); PDs were assessed by phospho-RIPK1 levels. Seventy-six subjects were enrolled between April 2021 and June 2022: 38 (part I) and 19 (part II) received GFH312; 14 and five received placebo, respectively. At least one treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) occurred in 42.1% (part I) and 63.2% (part II) of subjects receiving GFH312, compared with 42.9% and 40.0% of subjects receiving placebo, respectively. The most common TEAE was headache (21.1%). Two treatment-related TEAEs were reported in part I and four in part II. No serious TEAEs were reported. Systemic absorption was rapid; exposure (area under the concentration-time curve from time zero to the last measurable concentration and maximum plasma concentration) increased with dose level. The GFH312 CSF concentration post 100 mg single dose was approximately fourfold higher than the half maximal inhibitory concentration of human monocyte-derived macrophages necroptosis with expected central nervous system penetration. Subjects receiving GFH312 had decreased phospho-RIPK1 levels in peripheral blood mononuclear cells postdose. In conclusion, GFH312 was well-tolerated and demonstrated RIPK1 inhibition in healthy subjects. Ongoing studies will inform the use of GFH312 in potential indications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.