Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37345555›Full record

ArticleBJPsych open2023

Healthcare staff mental health trajectories during the COVID-19 pandemic: findings from the COVID-19 Staff Wellbeing Survey.

Julie-Ann Jordan, Ciaran Shannon, Dympna Browne, Emma Carroll, Jennifer Maguire, Keith Kerrigan, Sinead Hannan, Thomas McCarthy, Mark A Tully, Ciaran Mulholland and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BJPsych open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Julie-Ann JordanPhD, IMPACT Research Centre, Northern Health and Social Care Trust, Northern Ireland, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8037-404X
Ciaran ShannonDClinPsych, IMPACT Research Centre, Northern Health and Social Care Trust, Northern Ireland, UK.
Dympna BrownePhD, Belfast Health and Social Care Trust, Northern Ireland, UK.
Emma CarrollDClinPsych, Northern Health and Social Care Trust, Northern Ireland, UK.
Jennifer MaguireDClinPsych, PhD, South Eastern Health and Social Care Trust, Northern Ireland, UK.
Keith KerriganPhD, Northern Health and Social Care Trust, Northern Ireland, UK.
Sinead HannanDClinPsych, Southern Health and Social Care Trust, Northern Ireland, UK.
Thomas McCarthyDClinPsych, Western Health and Social Care Trust, Northern Ireland, UK.
Mark A TullyPhD, School of Medicine, Ulster University, Northern Ireland, UK.
Ciaran MulhollandMD, IMPACT Research Centre, Northern Health and Social Care Trust, Northern Ireland, UK.
Kevin F W DyerDClinPsych, PhD, IMPACT Research Centre, Northern Health and Social Care Trust, Northern Ireland, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCross-sectional studies have shown that the COVID-19 pandemic has had a significant impact on the mental health of healthcare staff. However, it is less well understood how working over the long term in successive COVID-19 waves affects staff well-being.

aimsTo identify subpopulations within the health and social care staff workforce with differentiated trajectories of mental health symptoms during phases of the COVID-19 pandemic.

methodThe COVID-19 Staff Wellbeing Survey assessed health and social care staff well-being within an area of the UK at four time points, separated by 3-month intervals, spanning November 2020 to August 2021.

resultsGrowth mixture models were performed on the depression, anxiety and post-traumatic stress disorder longitudinal data. Two class solutions provided the best fit for all models. The vast majority of the workforce were best represented by the low-symptom class trajectory, where by symptoms were consistently below the clinical cut-off for moderate-to-severe symptoms. A sizable minority (13-16%) were categorised as being in the high-symptom class, a group who had symptom levels in the moderate-to-severe range throughout the peaks and troughs of the pandemic. In the depression, anxiety and post-traumatic stress disorder models, the high-symptom class perceived communication from their organisation to be less effective than the low-symptom class.

conclusionsThis research identified a group of health service staff who reported persistently high mental health symptoms during the pandemic. This group of staff may well have particular needs in terms of the provision of well-being support services.

Indexed as

anxiety disordersDepressive disordershealthcare workerslongitudinaltrauma

Identifiers

PMID37345555
PMCPMC10305016

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.